My system is not decent

If you don't understand Western civilization, you will definitely feel shocked when you see these buildings.

For example, in the Bekaa Valley in central Lebanon, there is an ancient Roman site with a history of 2000 years: the "Temple of Baalbek".

This stone temple is very huge, even compared with modern buildings, it is considered domineering.

It is called "amazing" because it has quite a few boulders that are very heavy.

For example, the cornerstone of the main hall "Jupiter Temple", the lightest is 800 tons.

In the temple, there is a huge stone called "Stone of the South", which is 4.26 meters high, 21.3 meters long, 3.04 meters wide, and weighs 1240 tons.

The second is a huge stone called "Stone of Pregnancy", which weighs 1100 tons.

Beneath these boulders are seven smaller boulders, each estimated to weigh 7 tons.

Not only that: there is a 1650-ton boulder at the entrance of the temple.

Many people have no idea about the numbers of 350 tons, [-] tons, and [-] tons.

So, for example, behind the Palace of Preserving Harmony, there is a stone on the imperial road, which is called "Yunlong Stone Sculpture".

It is 16.57 meters long and weighs about 250 tons.

In order to transport it from Fangshan, 70 kilometers away, to the city, they used water to freeze it, and then sprinkled water again in front of the sled to form a water film on the ice.

In this way, it can be dragged inch by inch with the minimum friction.

According to the historical records of the Ming Dynasty "Two Palaces and Ding Jianji", in 1420 AD, the ancient Chinese used 2 people to transport this huge stone.

Among them, 1800 mules (tired to death) and 200 16-wheeled carts were also used.

In the end, it cost 11 taels of silver... After comparing China and the West, it feels like the Ming Dynasty is weak?

But is the Ming Dynasty 500 years ago really inferior to the ancient Romans 2000 years ago in terms of technical conditions and financial resources?

In order to answer this question, we might as well understand the history of "horse harness":

Before the 8th century AD, the only means of harnessing horses in the West was "throat-girth harness".

This method has a big drawback, the belt is especially easy to strangle the horse's throat.

The harder the horse exerts itself, the tighter the leash will tighten the throat, which will naturally suffocate the horse.

This phenomenon is more obvious in cavalry combat.

No matter how good the horse and rider are, there are serious obstacles to riding a horse over long distances.

A bad horse, on the other hand, not only tires easily, but also suffocates to death.

It was not until the 6th century that the advanced horse harness "chest harness" was introduced to Europe from Central Asia as the Huns invaded Hungary.

In 568 A.D., when the Avars invaded Hungary, they introduced Chinese chest harness and Madden to Europe.

After the 8th century AD, this advanced horse harness was widely used in Europe.

In the 1st century BC, the ancient Chinese invented the "collar harness", which was introduced to Europe again 1000 years later.

On the basis of the "collar harness", the ancient Chinese invented the "shoulder harness".

This simpler and more practical harness, which directly fastens the leather on both sides of the collar to the car, is still widely used around the world today.

According to the above, we can think of: using the ancient European horse harness, the horse will appear in several situations.

First of all, the pain strikes because the throat is tightened;

Second, suffocate or suffocate the horse with a neck injury.

As Needham puts it: "(Ancient European) girth harnesses are unlikely to pull modern vehicles, even empty ones."

Chen Wenzhe specifically checked, how much does a modern European-style carriage weigh?About six hundred catties to one ton.

Then in the 15th century, our country, with manpower and material resources and the most advanced harness, was very difficult to transport 250 tons of heavy objects.

However, before the 8th century, Europeans could not even pull 600-jin-1-ton heavy objects with their horses.

May I ask how to transport 2000 tons, 350 tons, or even 500 tons of stones in the ancient Roman temple 1650 years ago?

What advanced technologies are its transportation capabilities based on?

These ancient western stone buildings look stunning.

But a small horse harness can hit their culprit.

By the way, let's throw this question to the magical relics of various countries.

Such as: Mayan pyramids, the average weight of stones is 2.5 tons, and the heaviest is 16 tons.

Stonehenge in England, each about 50 tons.

The ancient Roman aqueduct Garci bridge, the heaviest is 5 tons.

The ancient Egyptian pyramid, the lightest 1.5 tons, the heaviest 160 tons.

Ancient Greek temple, a single stone, about 10 tons.

The Puma Punggu Temple in the secret country has a heaviest stone of 130 tons.

Zhiguo's Easter Island stone statues, 20-90 tons.

The Gobekli Tepe site in Turkey has an average of 50 tons of stones.

So the question is, who can tell us how these boulders, which far exceeded the transportation level at that time, were transported before the horse harness in our country was spread to the world?

If you insist on believing that they are monuments, you will definitely not be able to figure it out.

But in fact, you only need to remove the word "ancient"... The key is, do you choose to believe in the integrity of all countries in the world?Or are you willing to believe in the history of technological development?Trust your own reason?

Next, let's look at the history of metallurgy and discuss whether they are qualified to play with stones?

A few days ago, Chen Wenzhe also saw an article, "Revealing how fake Western ancient buildings are through the history of metallurgy and building materials".

In this article, the author's conclusion is that the stone or marble stone carvings used in construction should be roughly machined with pig iron tools, while granite must be cut with steel.

For the fine processing of stone, steel tools must also be used.

According to the history of the Francois machine and the water conservancy blower, it is judged that the Westerners learned to smelt pig iron in the 16th and 17th centuries.

Learning to make steel was later than the 19th century.

At that time, Chen Wenzhe realized it, so what happened to the 230 million megalithic pyramid?

But many people have not yet realized how widespread this view is and how devastating it is to the world's pseudo-ancient sites.

Simply put, once this point of view is established, then the pyramids, Roman temples, Pompeii, including various stone sculptures...

All of these will prove to be modern pseudo-ancient sites and modern works of art.

Besides, some people stood up to defend the point of view of cutting stone with pig iron.

It is said that the ancients in our country could cut jade, why can't they?

Also said that the Mohs hardness of bronze is higher than that of marble, why must it be cut with pig iron?

So in order to avoid seeing these silly words, you have to explain these basic common sense.

In the case of poor production technology, the ancients in our country used time-consuming and labor-intensive tools to disassemble jade sand, mounds, and sand lines to process jade.

The result is that it takes several years to carve a small piece of jade, and decades for a large one like a jade cong.

And the huge stone sculptures in the west, the individual stones are Greek temples weighing several tons, and each of them has a huge stone of 3000 yuan.

Let's talk about the pyramids, 230 million boulders.

It is impossible to use this method, so to say such stupid things is to expose the IQ.

In addition, although bronze has high hardness, it is brittle and easy to break.

You point it at the rock and hit it with a hammer.

With a little force, it may break into several sections immediately.

Therefore, it is impossible to use bronze tools to cut stones.