Rule department scholar

This paper describing the boundary of particles does not conflict with any definite laws of physics. At the same time, it explains and describes the reasons for the existence of many physical phenomena with theory.

For example, why does absolute zero exist?

For example, why the motion of particles is irregular.

For example, why does the Higgs field exist.

These are phenomena discovered in the course of physics research.

Before, no physicist would study why there is the problem of absolute zero. They just regarded this phenomenon as a rule that exists in the universe.

For example: gravity.

'Gravity' is the law that exists in the universe, but few people think about why there is universal gravitation?

The same is true for problems such as absolute zero and the irregular movement of particles. They are physical phenomena that have been discovered and exist, but few people think about why these phenomena exist.

This is also a very esoteric physics problem.

"Particle Boundary Theory" uses a unique mathematical method to describe the boundary of particles, deduces the boundary energy distribution that is irregular and cannot form a closed loop, and explains some physical problems.

Perlmutter read it from beginning to end, and then began to look at the detailed calculation content, and had a general impression of the theoretical description.

In this particle boundary theory, the description of the particle boundary energy distribution is a bit like a hard shell on the back of a snail, which rolls inward round and round, and the final end and starting point can never be connected together.

The energy of the particles is distributed in this way, and the energy itself will shift, and the direction of the shift is uncertain. Based on the distribution of irregular prime numbers, a situation will occur--

There is no any kind of external force acting on the particle to make it energy-balanced.

The reason is simple: the energy distribution of the prime sequence cannot form a regular closed loop.

This is like a three-dimensional tremor waveform diagram, because the prime number solutions represented by the waveform diagram are irregular, and the sum of all prime number solutions cannot be calculated.

in contrast.

For regular arithmetic progressions and geometric progressions, even if the elements in the set are infinite, the result can also be represented by column formula.

"Really..."

"Genius idea!"

Perlmutter read the manuscript again and found that he still didn't understand some of the content, so he simply chose to give up. He stretched for a long time, and looked at the time and found that it was already three o'clock in the morning.

He couldn't stand it anymore when he was getting older, he felt exhausted all over, so he stood up with some sighs, and was going to go to the next room to rest.

When he walked out of the door, he found that the light in the corner room was still on.

Perlmutter saw the figure working inside through the crack of the door, so he knocked on the door and called out, "Terry?"

It was Terence Tao inside.

Tao Zhexuan raised his head in surprise when he heard the shout, "Mr. Perlmutter? Why are you still here so late."

Perlmutter walked in with a smile and said, "Aren't you here?"

Terence Tao smiled.

Recently, he was working on a math problem, and he seized the inspiration and wanted to solve it in one go. He was just in his early thirties, and staying up all night was nothing, but Perlmutter was different. People who were almost sixty, staying up all night But it hurts the body.

Perlmutter approached and explained, "I saw a very interesting article, it belongs to Zhao Yi."

"Zhao Yi?" Tao Zhexuan asked in surprise, "Mathematics?"

"I'm not in charge of reviewing manuscripts for mathematics journals." Perlmutter shrugged.

"physics?"

Perlmutter nodded and said, "I can't say more about the specifics. It's just that I spent several hours and finally decided to submit it to the Advisory Committee. Maybe those people can help."

"So profound?"

"Ugh."

Perlmutter sighed and left the office without saying much.

Tao Zhexuan propped his chin with his hands, and shook his head helplessly.

He is interested in what Perlmutter said, but he is a mathematician and has no research on physics, so he can only sigh, "Compared to him, I seem to be an ordinary person."

……

The journal "Classical Gravity and Quantum Gravity" is the most famous physics journal in the world, and the accepted submissions are all top international physics research, so it naturally needs very important reviewers.

The Advisory Committee is the 'backup' top review team for Classical Gravity and Quantum Gravity.

Those manuscripts that ordinary review editors cannot understand will be submitted to the Advisory Committee, which will be managed by the committee and delivered to more professional review consultants based on the content of the manuscript and the opinions of review editors.

"The Boundary Theory of Particles" is the content of quantum physics, and it is also a theoretical paper. Perlmutter's side comment to the manuscript is, "This is an amazing research paper that requires top theoretical physicists, top Only mathematicians can judge its content."

The person in charge of the advisory committee saw the title of the paper, the name of the author, and the comments of the review editor, so he simply called the paper to two consultants.

One is George Smoot, a famous astrophysicist who has just won the Nobel Prize in Physics for his outstanding contributions to the cosmic microwave background radiation.

At UC Berkeley, George Smoot started the Berkeley Center for Cosmology.

The other is Professor Lisa Randall of Harvard University.

Famous female professors in the field of physics are as rare as gold. Especially in the field of theoretical physics, female physicists who can become famous are really more precious than diamonds.

Lisa Randall is such a woman. She became famous by proposing the "five-dimensional space" and claiming to challenge Einstein. Many people in the physics field do not recognize Lisa Randall's achievements and think that she Her achievements are sensational, and her fame is entirely due to her status as a 'female', but in any case, to become a professor of physics at Harvard University must have a certain level.

George Smoot has been busy with the affairs of the Cosmology Center recently, and did not see the email for the first time.

Lisa Randall was relatively free. When she came to the office in the morning, she turned on the computer and saw the manuscript in the mailbox, and then read it seriously.

She frowned after taking a closer look, and decided to 'reject' the manuscript in less than half an hour.

The reason for the label is, "The content does not have any meaning, it is a fraud to physics research!"

"Boundary studies of particles don't make any sense!"

In the end, I even added two sentences, which generally mean, "making up nonsense" and "shit doesn't make sense".

Rawls, the person in charge of the advisory committee, frowned when he saw Lisa Randall's reply.

Generally speaking, the manuscript sent to the advisory committee has been approved by the review editor, which has certain merits.

Lisa Randall not only dismissed the manuscript itself, but also trampled on the dignity of reviewer Perlmutter.

Perlmutter thought that the manuscript needed to be carefully reviewed, and he admitted that his level was not enough when he submitted it. As a result, when he came to the consultant editor, he quickly rejected it, saying "nonsensical fabrication" and "shit doesn't make sense"?

Rawls sent an inquiry email, and specifically marked the author of the contribution as Zhao Yi.

Lisa Randall quickly responded, "I still hold the same opinion. This paper is purely fabricated, a layman who doesn't understand physics research at all, and a fantasy about the study of the microscopic particle world."

Rolleston immediately gave up.

In fact, Lisa Randall did not have an opinion on Zhao Yi, but purely on the thesis itself.

Particle Boundary Theory is in direct conflict with Lisa Randall's 'fifth dimension' theory.

Lisa Randall is widely recognized because of the 'fifth dimension' theory. She gave public speeches everywhere and described her theory, which made her appear in Vogue Magazine, The New York Times, and Several related books have been published.

One can imagine how important the theory of the 'fifth dimension' is to her.

"Particle Boundary Theory" is to describe and analyze the internal energy form of particles, the premise is that the interior of particles can be divided, and it is not regarded as a point, a concept, or an energy mark alone.

This is where the conflict occurs.

The 'fifth dimension' theory believes that the fifth dimension exists around, but it is too small to be discovered by people. In the theory, particles are described as basic entities, for example, photons, which can be regarded as an energy mark, so that it can be used as a 'small to unnoticed thing' to escape the 'fifth dimension'.

If the smallest particle can also do internal analysis, the 'fifth-dimensional space' theory will be wrong, and it will be impossible to enter the 'fifth-dimensional space', which will also lead to what she discovered in the nuclear fission experiment. A particle disappeared strangely", which became a big joke.

How could Lisa Randall tolerate this happening?

When you see a theory that conflicts with your own research, you don't even have to think about driving it into the abyss.

The upper level of theoretical physics is really like a religion. There is no such thing as tolerance. After all, no one wants to deny the research content that he has been pursuing all his life.

For example, a theoretical physicist has spent his entire life studying string theory.

There is a theory that directly points out that string theory is wrong, how can it be accepted?Doesn't that mean that his lifelong research was a mistake?

This is a denial of life!

Absolutely unacceptable!

……

Yanhua University, at the entrance of the Faculty of Science Building.

Zhao Yi didn't know that his thesis was ruthlessly rejected by a menopausal female professor at Harvard University just because of theoretical conflicts.

He is also talking about the content of the research, and the object is Gao Yihua, a physics teacher.

The last time Gao Yihua explained the parity non-conservation problem to Zhao Yi, he thought Zhao Yi was doing some big research, but the matter seemed to have passed, and there was no news for a long time.

Zhao Yi seems to have returned to a normal life, and the content related to research is only an occasional trip to the Biomedical Research Institute.

This is not right!

Gao Yihua felt very depressed, he was still thinking about Zhao Yi's big research, so he asked Hu Zhibin to show off.

Now the chance seems to be gone.

"impossible!"

"Zhao Yi must have done some research, otherwise, why would he go to attend lectures, why would he ask about the non-conservation of parity?"

"At that time he also said that it would help..."

Gao Yihua really couldn't figure it out. After meeting Zhao Yi at the door of the building, he asked insincerely, "Zhao Yi, it was the last time, when you said you were doing research, I also talked about the non-conservation of parity..."

"What's wrong?" Zhao Yi was a little puzzled.

"How is your research going?" Gao Yihua asked directly.

"ended."

"ended?"

"correct."

Zhao Yi said, "I submitted the manuscript two weeks ago, but I don't know if it will pass the review or not." The boundary of particles is just a theory, and he doesn't know if it has any specific meaning, and whether it will be recognized by the physics community.

Gao Yihua immediately asked with interest, "What research is it, can you tell me?"

Zhao Yi nodded and said, "It's the boundary energy of the particle, the theory. I use mathematical methods to describe the energy inside the particle."

"For example, the smallest neutrino."

He held up a particle and said, "Neutrinos are almost impossible to detect, but such small particles must have some components. I think that the boundary of neutrinos conforms to the arrangement rules of gradient prime numbers. It is stronger than photons. The energy is introverted..."

"The more restrained the energy is, the stronger the penetration will be due to the regular distribution of its boundaries..."

"..."

"..."

Gao Yihua listened in a daze.

At the beginning, he was very interested, but then he simply couldn't understand it at all.

What is this talking about?

Why can I understand every word, every syllable, and even every paragraph, but I can't understand it at all when put together?

Chapter 3 Smoot: This is the first theory

Office on the first floor of the Faculty of Science.

Zhao Yi is briefly explaining his new research to several professors.

Several physics professors were very interested in his research, and mathematics professors such as Hu Zhibin and Zhou Li also came to listen carefully.

"My research is based on the existing physical system and the imagination of the composition of particles. The main content is to explain the composition rules of particle boundary energy."

Zhao Yi briefly introduced.

He first talked about the two most basic definitions, one is the particle in the title, and the other is the boundary.

Many kinds of things can be called particles, such as atoms, protons, electrons, tubes, and so on.

Particles are defined in particle theory as 'the tiniest composition', which can be understood as photons, neutrinos, electrons, bosons, etc.

Another definition is 'boundary'.

The definition of the boundary of particles is very vague, and there is no discussion about the composition of particles in existing physics, and particles are certainly not like a glass ball, and some are purely composed of energy.