This director only makes bad movies

["Titanic 2", a classic and excellent movie that ordinary audiences cannot understand. 】

"Hello everyone, I am Robert, the director of the Dragonfly Man series. I am posting this film review today mainly to analyze the movie "Titanic 2" and provide a reference for the audience and netizens."

"First of all, I want to make my conclusion clear. "Titanic 2" is a good movie. Although it is ahead of its time, it is extremely classic. It can even be said to be the best movie in history."

"I know many people will be surprised, surprised, or even confused by my conclusion, but please don't be surprised. I will carefully explain how I came to this conclusion next. After reading this film review, I believe you will also Agree with me."

"Many people think that "Titanic 2" is a bad movie, mainly for three reasons. One is that the film's setting is rough, the other is that the main actors have low looks and abnormal characters, and the third is that the plot is too subversive and outrageous. In addition, In addition, the dubbing, camera, action, and other major factors of the movie are not in line with the audience's aesthetics, so some people think this movie is a bad movie."

"But I want to say that this was deliberately shot like this by Cameron, because only by shooting in this way can the impact of the previous movie "Titanic" be completely subverted and his advanced ideological connotation expressed. At the same time, It is precisely because Cameron made the movie like this that I dare to say that this movie is the best movie since the birth of the movie."

"Below, I will explain the abnormal points of the movie one by one so that the audience can understand why Cameron did what he did."

"First of all, let's talk about the setting of the movie. Anyone who has watched the movie knows that the setting of this movie is extremely rough, and it can even be said to be eye-catching. For example, the theme of the movie, Titanic 2, is from the beginning to the end of the movie. , long shots appear very rarely, almost all of them are close-up shots. Even the close-up shots can show that the surrounding environment is extremely poor. The venue and props arranged have an obvious sense of cheapness. It does not look like being on a luxury cruise ship, but like a luxury cruise ship. It's an everyday situation like a classroom.

Especially in the upper-class dinner scene, the rough setting is even more obvious. The dining table is a plastic table, and the dishes on the table are three-piece burgers, fried chicken, and cola. Even the so-called upper-class people's clothing is obviously very poor. It doesn't reflect the identity of the upper class at all, and it makes people have no sense of belonging at all. "

"But I want to ask the audience, do you think that Cameron, a director without pursuit, would be so perfunctory when making movies?"

"In fact, directors who are a little bit more ambitious will strive for excellence in the movie's sets and props, and Cameron, as an excellent director and a world-class director who has achieved results, has done even more in this regard. Extreme.”

"When filming the movie Titanic, in order to pursue authenticity, he directly spent a lot of money in foreign countries to build a one-to-one simulation of the Titanic. This simulated Titanic was later made into a special studio by Fox Film and Television Used for filming movies, the tables, chairs, carpets, lamps, tableware and other items in the simulated Titanic are all made according to the layout of the real Titanic. It can be said that this is equivalent to making a new ship as it is. Titanic."

“At that time, Fox Film and Television, which was responsible for providing the filming funds, did not think it was necessary to do it so well, and even thought that it would be enough to only do part of it, so that it could achieve the ideal shooting effect and save a lot of money.

But Cameron felt that this was not possible. The tough requirements must be perfect without any flaws. An interesting thing even happened at that time. In order to prevent Cameron from spending money, the producer of Fox Film and Television said that he would Jump into the sea, and then Cameron really let him jump into the sea. "

"Even because Cameron was too diligent in filming, Fox Film and Television once sent people to the crew to check the accounts, and almost kicked Cameron out of the crew. In this way, there would be no Titanic movie. Even if it can be released normally, It wouldn’t be what we see today.”

"Haven't the audience ever thought about it? Why is such a director who is extremely serious about making movies and is willing to sacrifice his career prospects in order to achieve the effect he wants, why did the set decoration of Titanic 2 be so bad!"

"Because Cameron did this on purpose. He wanted to use subversive scenery to achieve a contrasting effect, allowing the audience to wake up and understand the profound connotation he expressed."

"Gorgeous and realistic sets are no longer what Cameron is pursuing. These things have no meaning for his filmmaking, and they cannot match Cameron's filmmaking realm."

"As a world-class director, Cameron's understanding of movies has gone far beyond ordinary people and ordinary directors. The new movies he shot are also too advanced, so they are incomprehensible to ordinary audiences."

"In fact, the reason why Cameron deliberately used rough sets was to create a sense of contrast and subversion, and then use this sense of contrast and subversion to impact the audience's understanding of the nature of the film and reshape the audience's understanding of the film. Appreciation of aesthetics and scenery broadens the audience’s aesthetic vision.”

"In addition, the rough scenery and harsh environment can enrich the film's sense of layering and contrast. The rough background also breaks through the strict and serious aesthetics of traditional films and brings a unique, multi-layered viewing experience to the audience. .”

"Cameron's unique rough-style scenery is a subversive innovation in traditional film shooting techniques and a bold cutting-edge exploration of film shooting techniques. This fearless courage deserves great appreciation."

"What is commendable is that because of his superb filmmaking skills and rough and exaggerated scenery, not only did it not affect the structure of the film, but it made the film stand out from ordinary films, with a unique sense of freshness and the natural beauty of the film."

"Director Cameron has great determination and courage to dare to use rough and exaggerated sets to shoot a movie. The audience may not understand or appreciate it, but please don't say that the movie's sets are bad."

"This is a cutting-edge shooting technique explored by Director Cameron, which brings a unique beauty to the movie. Current audiences may not be able to appreciate it, but this does not mean anything. It only means that you cannot accept it now. It does not mean that the movie is not good-looking. .”

"When the audience's aesthetic appreciation reaches a certain level, they will naturally be able to understand the subtlety and boldness of this film's scenery. By then, the film's rough and exaggerated scenery will become a textbook for all directors."