This director only makes bad movies

How could this actress be so ugly!

Pedro was shocked.

Generally speaking, in big-budget movies, the selection criteria for roles are very strict. Handsome men and beautiful women are the most basic requirements. Even if the plot requires the selection of clowns, they must be selected with distinctive features.

But what's the matter with this actress? She's so obviously ugly that it even makes people sick to their stomachs and makes them physically uncomfortable.

How does such an actor get into a movie? This is simply provoking the audience.

Is it an important supporting role?

Pedro couldn't help but think that such an ugly actor could never be the protagonist.

But the development of the plot soon shattered his fantasy. The actor's name was Lucy, and she was a rich lady. She had a fiancé named Carter, who was very infatuated with her.

The two bought first-class tickets and prepared to take the luxury cruise ship Titanic 2 to the United States.

Seeing this, Pedro frowned.

From the beginning, he felt that something was wrong with the movie, but he never found out what was wrong.

It wasn't until now that he suddenly reacted.

How could the set of this movie be so bad?

Isn't this the first-class cabin of a luxury cruise ship? Why does it look like a classroom?

Isn't that the blackboard where the oil painting is hanging?

Moreover, the oil painting is also ugly. It doesn’t look like a masterpiece at all, but like an amateur’s random graffiti.

what's the situation?

Cameron always strives for perfection when making movies.

It is said that when the Titanic was first filmed, in order to pursue authenticity, all the tableware, tables, chairs and other arrangements on the ship1 were specially customized by famous artists to ensure that they were exactly the same as the Titanic that sank back then. This cost a lot of money. No matter what.

No matter what Cameron's personality is like, his attitude towards making movies is beyond words.

but.

How could the sets in this movie be so bad?

Pedro racked his brains and couldn't figure out what was going on. How could the setting of Cameron's movie be so bad.

Is there any deep meaning in this?

The plot quickly progresses to the cruise ship sailing and a banquet held in the first class cabin.

At the banquet, Lucy, a rich girl, used sweet words to charm her fiancé into having his identity reversed, and at the same time, he was still hooking up with others. It can be said to be extremely green tea.

By chance, she left the first-class cabin and ran to the deck to enjoy the scenery.

Here, she met Jet, a poor boy from the third class.

Jet is very handsome, with a pair of beautiful blue eyes as deep as the sea. He is also the most handsome actor in Titanic 2. He immediately became the focus of the audience when he appeared on the screen.

After discovering this handsome third-class guy, Lucy was so impressed by his appearance that she actually took the initiative to strike up a conversation.

Jet originally didn't want to pay attention to Lucy, an ugly girl, but when he learned that Lucy was a rich man living in first class, he suppressed his nausea and took the initiative to hook up with Lucy.

The two hit it off immediately and quickly got together.

Pedro was shocked.

Why is the plot of "Titanic 2" the same as that of "Titanic"?

They are all stories about a rich girl living in first class and a poor boy in third class. The names are similar to the first one. Ruth becomes Lucy and Jack becomes Jet.

The only change is that the rich lady is played by an ugly girl, and she changes from a woman who hates the rules and regulations of the upper class to a green tea who likes to seduce men and cheat on her.

Why did Cameron shoot like this?

This is a complete subversion of the previous movie!

Subversion is fine, but you don’t want the filming to be so bad?

The plot progresses rapidly. Lucy and Jet are fighting fiercely. Lucy is attracted to Jet's face, and Jet is attracted to Lucy's money. The two bitches are in love and hook up. .

During this period, a friend who lived with Jet in the third class cabin asked him why he was with such an ugly woman. Jeter said bluntly that it was because this woman was rich.

This plot completely exposed Jet's terrible character, making the audience who originally had a good impression of Jet because of his appearance extremely despise him.

Soon, Ruth's fiancé Carter accidentally bumped into Lucy and Jeter together. The infatuated Carter was extremely surprised and asked Ruth what their relationship was.

Lucy boldly said that Jet was a friend she met by chance, and fooled Carter in a few words.

The most amazing thing is that when Lucy was fooling Carter, she didn't forget to continue hooking up with the poor boy Jet. Now that she has a husband, she can be called a scumbag in the extreme.

The silly Carter didn't notice anything was wrong, but instead enthusiastically invited Jet to dinner. His personality can be said to be very good.

Titanic also has a classic dinner party scene.

Carl, the rich fiancé of Ruth, looked down on the poor boy Jack and deliberately tried to make things difficult for him at a high-society dinner. As a result, Jack's extraordinary words made him shine, which made Carl lose face.

This plot fully illustrates that money does not represent everything about a person. The connotation of poor people is actually better than that of rich people. They are not rich enough because they are not bad enough.

Regardless of whether Cameron thought so when he filmed this scene, this is how the vast majority of poor people understand it.

But in "Titanic 2", this plot changes a lot.

Rich fiancé Carter is a kind man. Hearing that Jet is Lucy's good friend, not only is he not angry, but he wants to support him.

As a result, Jett was a man with a good appearance but a lot of bad things on the outside. Although he had a handsome appearance, he was very miserable on the inside. He was a complete idiot. Not only did he fail to accept Carter's support and overtures, but he made a big fool of himself. He made a fool of himself and was embarrassed at a high-society dinner party.

When he saw this, Pedro was extremely confused.

Why did Cameron choose to shoot this plot in a way that subverted the previous movie? What exactly was he thinking.

The key point is, can upper-class dinner parties not be so shabby?

At the time of the Titanic, upper-class dinner parties were in large rooms, with gorgeous decorations, bright lights, and luxurious tableware.

But in this movie, the table is made of plastic tableware, the cutlery is made of plastic cutlery, but the food on the table is still burgers, fried chicken and sandwiches?

Damn, this is what the upper class eats at dinner parties?

The drink at the dinner was actually Coke, a low-end fat house happy water.

Is there any mistake?

Pedro couldn't stand it anymore.

He could barely bear the messy set at the front of the movie, but when he saw Coke and hamburgers and fried chicken sandwiches blatantly placed on the table with a close-up, he really couldn't bear it anymore.

Cameron, how could you make a movie like this?