The Sage of Confucianism and Taoism

Tears are pouring down...

Zhang Zhongjing's status in Chinese medicine is so high that it cannot be measured. He is truly the first person in medicine. Even after the warm disease school became popular, he is still respected as the medical saint.

The book never denies Hua Tuo's status, but we should distinguish between Hua Tuo in "Romance of the Three Kingdoms" and Zhang Zhongjing in Chinese medicine.

Don't say that Hua Tuo's status is higher than Zhang Zhongjing to blacken me and make others laugh, okay?

My readers can't be so silly.

It's not that whoever is famous in a non-professional field is awesome in a professional field. Fame and status are not the same thing.

That's what I said, but many people went to support it. What grudges do they have against this book?

Other ways of blackening it are fine, but this way really hits my point. I really don't use this way of attacking the right with the wrong to blacken this book. It's too much of a blow.

This kind of thing happened more than once or twice.

For example, the word "Bin" in Sun Bin's name means kneecap, which is correct. However, there are three types of punishments: "Binbi", "Binjiao" and "Binfa". Among them, only "Binfa" means removing the kneecap. "Records of the Grand Historian" clearly states that Sun Bin was punished with "Binjiao", which means cutting off the lower leg below the knee. This statement has been very popular for a long time, but some people still oppose it and insist on saying that the kneecap was removed.

It's like one breath equals one second. My setting refers to the time of rapid breathing during fast running. Like "hours", it is a military calculation method. It is actually to give modern readers a more specific concept of time and reduce reading difficulties. Even the author's simple intention cannot be seen. What is there to be complacent about? Manual nose picking picture.

Some people say that hand, foot and mouth disease is a modern disease. It did not exist in ancient times. It can be calculated according to pathology. In ancient times, this thing was children's mouth sores, pox sores, etc. The symptoms and pathology are very similar, but the name of this disease in later generations is more specific and detailed.

Some people also accused the book of wrongly canonizing the six sub-saints. King Wen and Xunzi were originally of high status, so I won't talk about them. As for the other four, they are "canonized" figures in the "current" Confucius Temple. Why do some people look down on them and let others replace them, and insist that the author is making up stories?

Do you really think that I can canonize any disciple of Confucius that I like, and not canonize any disciple that I don't like?

No one is without faults. I am definitely not omniscient and omnipotent. I will correct my mistakes, but when someone makes a mistake, what does it mean to look down on others?

It's not that I am not calm. I don't want to say these things, but from the time this book was published to now, I have been repeating these things continuously. I have been holding it in for almost a year and I can't hold it in anymore.

Alas, if I say this kind of thing, there will definitely be people who say that you, the author, have a wrong mentality, don't accept criticism, are narrow-minded, and are the remnants of Wen Ge. If I don't say it, many readers will be misled and really think that I am making up stories and taking the fake as the real.

Well, actually I am not really angry, because I am good at self-reflection. After all, when I was the most ignorant, I also felt that I was very awesome. I had no ability but I looked down on others.

I said these things today to prevent readers from being misled by those people. Please take the correct content of the book as the standard, and build a socialist and harmonious Shengyuan Continent under the guidance of Confucius, Mencius's thoughts, Xunzi's theory, Dong Zhongshu's great unification representative and... I dare not continue to say these two!