Blame me for being too attractive

The following story is just like that recorded in Greek mythology, the pain of the goddess of beauty moved Zeus, the lord of the gods, and then the belonging of the beautiful boy was also settled in the words of the other party.

He is like a commodity, whose ownership and ownership are divided by the gods in the name of love.As for whether this belonging is what he wants, no one cares.

In the United States, a country that regards freedom and democracy as its life, this tragedy that has not been directly pointed out seems to have been received by everyone watching.

Does Beauty love him?

No one would say that she doesn't love Adonis. As a god, she loves such humbleness.But no matter how humble she is, she is still a god after all.

So even if the other person is dead, as long as you still love him, you should try your best to make the other person come back to accompany you, even in the state of not loving, this is the dominance and arrogance of the gods.

When Adonis returned from the underworld to the yang world, the progress bar of the movie was also pulled to the end.There is the pain of losing the love of the God of Beauty and finding it again, and naturally there is also the reluctance and helplessness of the Empress Dowager.

At the moment Adonis walked out of the underworld, behind him was endless darkness, which was the epitome of death, and in front of him was a vibrant light, which was the color of life.

Light and shadow have been perfectly separated in him, just like his destiny of being half of the time in the underworld and half of the time in the world of yang was determined by the king of gods.

He was divided into two halves, each of which belonged to a god, but none of it belonged to himself.But Meeks, who plays Adonis, still looks so arrogant, as if no matter how you decide, you can't change my own will.

The Goddess of Beauty stared at her lover who was returning to the mortal world, her eyes were so focused and obsessed, as if the other party was the only one in her life.

And Adonis, who was watched by her, just smiled casually the moment he saw her.

How to describe this smile, this smile seems to be the same as at the beginning of the movie, and it seems to be a little more mocking than at the beginning.

What is he mocking?

Is he mocking the fate that he cannot control independently, or the love that the gods are destined not to get from him, or he is simply mocking everything, after all, he is a young man who is so arrogant that he doesn't even care about the gods.

In myths and stories, it is clearly recorded how beautiful Adonis was, so much so that it moved the two high goddesses.In the myths, it is clearly recorded how much the Goddess of Beauty loved Adonis, and even fought endlessly with the Queen of the Underworld for this.In the myths, it is clearly recorded how the God of Beauty was in pain after Adonis died, so much so that the Lord of the Gods was moved...

But in the myths and stories, it has never been said what kind of mood the beautiful boy who returned to the sun is like.

He never expressed his admiration for any god from the beginning to the end, but just because of that rare beauty, he fell into such an unreasonable fight.

In the end, like a spoil of war, Adonis was "equally divided" by the two goddesses, what was the result after the division?

It was not recorded in Greek mythology, nor was it told in the movie. He just left people with a casual smile and room for unlimited imagination.

The movie is over, but Adonis seems to remain in everyone's heart.

His beauty may not be liked by everyone, but it can definitely be remembered by everyone.

Meeks and Adonis, the product of the laboratory and the forbidden son born of incest, they are so similar, as if they are destined, they have such a fate.

The audience didn't know the ingenuity, but they also noticed the special chemical reaction between the actors and the characters.

This kind of reaction is not only because of the appearance, but also some other things that cannot be said.

The movie is over, but the fermentation of public opinion has just begun.

Frankly speaking, this movie simply presents the life of a Greek mythological figure in the form of a movie.

To put it bluntly, this is a very simple story of Greek mythology.And this story is neither as grand as the battle of the gods, nor as tragic as the twilight of the gods, and there is no struggle between man and god. This is the story of a beautiful boy being scrambled by the gods.

Phils didn't think about deepening the theme, nor did he think about giving the audience any general education.He just filmed the fairy tale, he didn't even make any adaptation of the fairy tale.

In fact, this story does not need to be adapted, because the story of Adonis itself is exciting enough.His ability to pass on from the era of word of mouth to the present also proves this point.

The ability to measure a director has never been close-ups, long-range shots, or special lighting effects. Being able to shoot a story well is the best embodiment of a director's ability.

And the smile of Adonis at the end actually came from Meeks' impromptu performance.

Phils thought it was good, so he kept it.

It is precisely because of this reservation that the chemical reaction produced by the interweaving of Meeks' appearance and the audience's reading comprehension ability beyond Fils' imagination is absolutely explosive.

Not long after the premiere, entries such as Adonis' smile and who Adonis loves began to occupy major social platforms at a speed visible to the naked eye.

There is no need to elaborate too much, just hang up the image of Meeks in the movie on the platform, and the attention brought by the top beauties is absolutely unprecedented.

At the beginning, Meeks’ face was not shown on the movie promotional posters because he wanted to use Meeks’ appearance as a secret weapon. Now it seems that this tactic is really not right or wrong.

After all, if Meeks' face was directly used as one of the publicity points at that time, the attention and enthusiasm it attracted would definitely explode.

However, if Meeks' appearance is exposed too early, the stunning feeling when the movie is released will inevitably be slightly discounted.

Along with everyone's curiosity about beauties, the screening rate of "Adonis" in various theaters has skyrocketed. After all, who would have trouble with money.

And for such a beauty, after the first brush, how can she not be brushed twice, after the second brush, three brushes, four brushes will become a matter of course.

At this moment, everyone seemed to be a god of beauty, obsessively chasing the beautiful young man.

But the boy in reality seems to be harder to catch than Adonis. No matter how popular the movie is, Meeks never appeared from the beginning to the end, and he didn't even attend the premiere.

This is definitely a good point of attack for other actors.However, considering everyone's enthusiasm for beauties, no newspaper is "committing crimes against the wind" at this time.

Because this is not a principled mistake at all, it is playing big cards at best, and some people may even regard it as a manifestation of the other party's personality.

If this report is released at this time, the masses may spontaneously whitewash it in an instant. It is useless, and it is a waste of effort.

Instead of this, it would be more effective to keep it temporarily and wait for some suitable opportunity to explode together in the future.

However, the leading actor can't spray it for the time being, but the director can still.

On the second day after the film's premiere, articles slamming the director have been freshly published.

The reporters are not fools, and they will not confront the audience who are obsessed with beauties, but this does not stop them from criticizing the director, after all, the director is not a beauty.

One of the film reviews titled "Tricky Casting and Tricky Topic Selection" can be said to have brought the best of praise and derogation to the extreme.

The general content of this film review is as follows. He ostensibly praised the degree of adaptation between the protagonist Meeks and the character Adonis, and pointed out how convincing the new screenwriter's writing of the plot was.

But in fact, he was secretly directing the role of the beauty pageant boy, and playing the role of the beauty boy was just opportunistic.And choosing a new screenwriter, and choosing a subject like Greek mythology, no matter how unreliable, becomes reasonable as soon as he touches it, is also opportunistic.The entire film review fully affirmed the beauty of the lead actor, but also fully denied the director's ability.

The level of yin and yang strangeness is indeed an old onmyoji.

There is also a film review titled "The Coming of the Age of "Beauty"".

Compared with the last one, this one is more straightforward and full of malice.

One of the paragraphs reads: "Some unskilled sex/erotic/directors rely on the excellent flesh/body and large/scale/scale content of the actors to win the audience's attention, and then call it art .And Firth's 'art' is obviously more ingenious. He uses the actor's extremely outstanding face. The difference between the two may be that one relies on the flesh/body and the other relies on the face. In essence, they Still 'selling sex'. Jack brought us an era, a great movie era, and his son seems to want to bring us an era, a 'beautiful' movie era..."

He almost pointed at Fiers' nose and said directly, you are no different from those low-level porn directors, and you are far worse than your father.

And even more than that, there are many others, some even scolding directly.There are also some film critics who have always supported Fiers before, but this time they have a different opinion.

If you have to face such comments for every movie, even people with the best psychological quality will collapse.

But this time, Phils no longer cared as much as usual.

Not only because of the confidence that Meeks gave him, but also because this time the audience is finally not being led by the nose.

That's right, Phils' director skills and the level of movies he made are still not as good as his father's.But the beauties that appeared in his movies were far beyond his father's reach.

For this "gratitude" for bringing beauty to them, everyone always has to say a few words for Phils, and to be honest, as a director, Phils himself is quite capable.

Therefore, the audience's movie viewing comments are completely different from those of those movie reviews.

The straightforward ones are:

"Thank you, Phils, for bringing us the great beauty, so that the era of beauty will be more vigorous. I also want to be a beauty god!"

"Oh my god! I'm going to suffocate, how can there be such a beautiful woman in this world!!!!"

"I've done it five times, but how can I watch enough beauties? It's a pity I didn't get the ticket for the sixth one. I'm even sadder than the beauty god after Adonis' death. Can I move Zeus to give me one Movie tickets?!"

……

Literary ones include:

"He seems to have lost his freedom, but he is always so free and beautiful."

"In Adonis, I seem to see an epic story of human beings fighting against the gods. Maybe we can't do anything to the power of the gods at that time, but we can decide where our souls take refuge."

"The beauty of Adonis never blooms for anyone, he belongs only to nature, only to himself."

……

Of course, not all the audience gave all praises, and there were some bad comments among them, but compared with the previous one-sided criticism, this time the criticism can be said to be an army of praises, directly shot to death on the beach.

Judging from the audience's after-views and film critics' reviews, apart from directly or indirectly acknowledging the protagonist's beauty, they split as if Phils had made two completely different movies.