Subverted This is the Emperor Chat Group

………………

And Li Zicheng also took advantage of this time period to frantically search in Chen Tong's space, trying to find a strong argument.

He absolutely cannot lose this time.

On the one hand, he already admired Yuan Chonghuan in his heart, and on the other hand, that would not allow Chongzhen to escape sanctions.

The people do not pay:

"You think Yuan Chonghuan is out of personal interests, and you think he was Mao Wenlong who was killed by the party and the party."

"That's classic exaggeration."

"You can't see what Mao Wenlong has done?"

"Not to mention anything else, let's take a look at the twelve major crimes that Yuan Chonghuan convicted Mao Wenlong when he killed Mao Wenlong."

"Article [-]..."

As soon as he said this, Li Zicheng himself got stuck.

Because among the information he was looking for, the first one was really hard to say.

.........

Chen Tong shook his head lightly, his eyes full of sarcasm.

Chen Tong:

"Why don't you say it?

Do you feel that the first one is nonsense?

Since you dare not say it, I will tell everyone.

Yuan Chonghuan charged Mao Wenlong with the first crime, and I was afraid of laughing your big teeth out if I said it.

Yuan Chonghuan actually said:

Mao Wenlong, as a general leading the army, is not under the supervision of civil officials, so his crime is unforgivable!

Just from this sentence, you can see how crooked Yuan Chonghuan's butt is! "

………………

What the hell!

At this moment, Yue Fei wanted to scold his mother, what the hell was said by a general?

bristle:

"Some people say that Yuan Chonghuan is a civil servant. I didn't believe it before."

"Now Yuan Chonghuan has said all this."

"It makes me sick."

"When will military generals be under the supervision of civil servants, and this has become a customary thing?"

"Has Yuan Chonghuan's brain been kicked by a donkey?"

………………

Li Er also looked up to the sky and laughed.

Qiangu Li Er (the ruler of the Ming Dynasty and the sinner):

"Why is the Song Dynasty so weak? Isn't it just using literature to suppress martial arts?"

"As a result, Yuan Chonghuan, as a general, was willing to be controlled by civil servants."

"There is a saying, don't listen to what he says, but watch how he does it."

"From what Yuan Chonghuan did, it can be seen that Yuan Chonghuan's ass is definitely on the side of the Donglin Party members,"

"And he regards himself as a civil servant."

"Why did he kill Mao Wenlong?"

"Is it a crime that generals are not under the control of civil servants?"

"And it's the number one crime!"

"How ridiculous!"

........................

Li Zicheng has no way to lie to Yuan Chonghuan at this moment, because he feels stupid if he tells this reason!

You actually used the way civil servants deal with generals to convict Mao Wenlong.

It's just as exhilarating as hell.

He felt ashamed.

However, Li Zicheng still wants to continue to wash Yuan Chonghuan.

The people do not pay:

"The first one may be a slip of the tongue, an absolute slip of the tongue."

"Let's look at the second article. Yuan Chonghuan said: Mao Wenlong deceived the emperor and committed crimes. Mao Wenlong's memorials to the court are all swindles and abductions."

"Say that Mao Wenlong killed surrendered soldiers and refugees, pretending to be military."

"This crime, right!"

…………

At this moment, Li Shimin wants to spray people, that's right!

Qiangu Li Er (the ruler of the Ming Dynasty and the sinner):

"How can Yuan Chonghuan be sure that Mao Wenlong is deceiving the emperor?

Did he send spies to Mao Wenlong's subordinates?

Does he know everything that Mao Wenlong has done?

I think that apart from Mao Wenlong, the biggest possibility is that the golden man who paid the most attention to Mao Wenlong at that time, and Emperor Tianqi.

Either Yuan Chonghuan was biting wantonly, or Yuan Chonghuan had a certain amount of information exchange with the Jinren, so he was able to know so clearly.

You must know that Yuan Chonghuan belongs to the Donglin Party, and he is definitely not on the side of Emperor Tianqi.

If this is true, then you have to reconsider the relationship between Yuan Chonghuan and the Jinren.

This is the first aspect of the problem.

Then let's look at the next question, was it wrong for Mao Wenlong to kill the soldiers who surrendered?

When is it stipulated that generals cannot kill surrendered soldiers?

Look at how Mao Wenlong killed many refugees?

The point is, are these refugees from the Ming Dynasty?

What if it's the Mongols and the Jins again?

His so-called killing the good and taking the meritorious service, in the Liaodong area, are the Donglin Party members still doing less?

Did Yuan Chonghuan even do it himself?

It's hard to say.

In other words, Yuan Chonghuan has no conclusive evidence at all, which is actually just talking nonsense and accusing him of crimes. "

………………

Cao Cao laughed.

Friends of wives:

"Yuan Chonghuan went to convict Mao Wenlong, but he didn't see anything wrong with Mao Wenlong,"

"But I discovered that Yuan Chonghuan and the Jinren may have some tricks."

"Isn't it weird?"

"That's the point!"

………………

Li Zicheng was completely dumbfounded. What if he agreed to criticize Mao Wenlong?

Why did you point the finger at Yuan Chonghuan?

He felt that the limelight was wrong.

Moreover, he had no way to refute what Li Shimin said.

Or admit that Yuan Chonghuan is talking nonsense without any evidence.

Either it means that Yuan Chonghuan had a certain collusion with the Jinren to obtain such conclusive evidence.

No matter how you say it, it doesn't sound good.

So he quickly dropped these two questions and moved on to the next one.

The people do not pay:

"The third point is that Mao Wenlong said that he is stationed in Dengzhou. If he goes to Nanjing from here, it will be easy."

"Isn't this outrageous?"

………………

Chen Tong's eyes were full of sneers.

Chen Tong:

"Mao Wenlong's speech is indeed not pleasant.

But is that wrong?

If Dengzhou is occupied, it will be easy to attack Nanjing by sea.

This is obviously a military issue, why do you want to regard it as treason?