Proof of the Sun King

Just today, Attack on Titan ended.

After watching the ending, I always felt that there was an old groove stuck in my throat. I really couldn't vomit, and I couldn't find a place to say it, so I decided to post it here. If you are not interested or don't know, you can skip it. affect anything.

(The following is the personal opinion of the emperor. If you don't like it, don't spray it. You are right.)

Attack on Titan is over, and episode 139 "To the Tree on the Hill" officially ends.

After watching the ending, I kept wanting to say something but couldn't.

That is to say, you can feel that Isayama wants to say something in the ending, but from the storyboard to the details to the character dialogue and the introduction of the background, it is actually extremely blurred.

After the Earthquake, after 80% of the population perished, everything seemed to be over, the giant disappeared, and the world ushered in a brief peace.

But is it over?

No, the author clearly tells us that the cycle of hatred is not over.

The giant is gone, but both sides are preparing for war, preparing to kill the other side, and both are falling into extreme war frenzy.

Survey Corps is dead and dead and disabled.

Countless mortals died in this disaster.

But the group of "war criminals" who committed the biggest crime lived well.

Although it seems peaceful on the surface, it can be seen from the dialogue in the voyage in the plot that the world is still surging. In the end, Mikasa reached out and pressed Alan's head, telling him that he could see everyone, and then pulled the scarf with a bird and Spread the wings to end.

Do you feel unfulfilled and inexplicable?

Yes, I feel that way too.

I can feel that So Isayama, as the author, wants to express and satirize something through this ending, but due to the extreme obscurity and cover-up, on the one hand, everything stops abruptly, and on the other hand, there is endless aftertaste and unfinished meaning.

Let me offer some of my personal views.

First of all, what I want to say is, don’t just look at a bunch of analysis and certain judgments, first make sure that Isayama is an “extreme right wing” and “anti-war loser”. It's true, there are too many self-media and too well know how to incite the emotions of netizens. They know that it is very easy to get traffic and deceive a lot of likes once this judgment and answer are posted, so they must say this and answer this way.

In fact, I personally think that the irony of this ending is very deep, but it doesn't necessarily mean anything, because in a certain way, everything makes sense.

First of all, this ending can be understood as Isayama's satire on the superstructure of the current book. I still have some research on the superstructure of the book. It can be said that more than a thousand years ago, since the high-level management of the book began to take turns in the government of the Sheguan Academy to the present , the political structure of the book has not changed, forever aristocracy and take turns ruling.

As we all know, many of them have committed numerous crimes. During the Tokyo Trial, the International Court of Justice gave justice to many of them, but there are still many who escaped the net without being liquidated (or partially exonerated or even released afterwards), and As the Murayama talk was gradually forgotten and the new century arrived, Benzi had gradually forgotten the facts and the crimes he had committed.

As said in the ending, there is no remorse, only fanaticism, no apology, only Tata Kai! Tata open!

Secondly, of course, the ending of "Giant" can also be understood as an anti-defeat, which seems to be no problem. You can feel through the dialogue between Allen and Armin that Allen who launched the Earth Scream has a deep apology?

No, but also modified and sealed the memory.

The Yeager faction successfully came to power, controlled the Eldians, continued to incite, continued to be fanatical, and continued to Tatakai!

We have not failed, we have to recast the glory of the island!

This can be seen as the author's own unwillingness to the status quo and a kind of long-standing vent.

I really don't get used to the current situation, there is no doubt about that.

Due to some well-known reasons, it is inconvenient to expand on this point (laughs), and I understand it.

Finally, there is an understanding.

The author sees too much, he is laughing.

Laugh at what?

Laughing, nothing has changed, he has seen through everything, through the reincarnation of human history.

Does it make a difference whether it is activated or not?

Is there a difference between a world with giants and a world without giants?

Has the chain of hatred been interrupted?

No, not at all.

Keep fighting until one side is dead!

The world where only Eren and Mikasa were injured has been achieved!

Then everything went back to square one.

So many people died in the entire survey corps, and the captain was half-crippled. The heroic souls who gave countless hearts to save the world were exchanged for the extermination of the Ai tribe, and in exchange for a murderer's family reunion, the victims looked at them and laughed. ending?

The heart is dedicated to the dog, right?

A group of war criminals are reunited with their families and reunited with Meimei. The innocent people who died really love to die, right?

I personally think that the three endings can be understood in any way, because the author probably intentionally left it blank. On the one hand, it is to avoid the criticism of the straightforward point of view (it may also be forced by the publisher), and on the other hand, he probably does not want to. to die.

So, to sum up, is Attack on Titan unfinished?

Personally, in my opinion, it is unquestionably unfinished.

Except for a lot of foreshadowing and many plots that have not been extended and explained, the last and most critical, the theme of the entire comic "freedom" and "breaking the cycle of hatred" are all fed **** in the ending, the author tells you directly .

What is the freedom Allen really wants?

Free to die, yesyes!

What is really breaking the cycle of hatred?

Just kill all of them~www.wuxiaspot.com~ Then you spent 138 chapters trying to discuss and sublimate the chain theme of freedom and hatred. What you have been struggling with and thinking about before is a chicken. neck?

Wouldn't it be over to say this early?

It’s like the chef who cooks has talked about countless theories and arranged countless ingredients, and when he has done N many procedures and is ready to serve, is he hungry outside? dinner.

Evil is not disgusting people, is it difficult?

Anyway, I am very uncomfortable. I like giants very much, and I wrote a lot of thoughts about the plot in the book. For example, when Macado and Ryan talked about freedom, I just put my understanding of giants (including many on the Internet). analysis of people) took it in.

Then according to Isayama's arrangement, in the end, Malcador's answer was Chaos diedie, and the Emperor yesyes was done, right?

fuck! ! !

I am really getting old Sun Yifeng.

If I follow this line of thinking, then I will write the ending like this.

In the 40th millennium after the end of the Earthquake, there are no Eldians, no Marais, everyone has forgotten what hatred is driving them to kill, but human beings want to kill, that is If you want to kill, even if one faction wins, a new faction will soon split and continue to kill until there is only one person left in the world to eat chicken.

Perpetual hatred and anger, perpetual hostility and slaughter.

What, you don't want to kill? How old are you? You must not be human, are you? Or did you receive money from a big country across the sea?

Murder is right!

Yoxi, I'm going to kill you today!

Kill him!

…………I am the dividing line of random killing…………

After the rant is over, everyone just smiles.