New Shun 1730

Since it is all a process, the whole set of "superstitions of past things" such as retro, radical, imperial, feudal, pure capitalism, etc. must be broken in the end.

It is nothing more than the order of which ones to break first and which ones to break later, and the time of the process.

None can be left out.

All must be gone through.

So, the emperor talked about "Wang Xie Yan, the people's home"; talked about "following the British and French "Cotton Cloth Prohibition Order" to use administrative means to build a new Great Wall to hinder the inward impact of capital and cheap industrial products"; talked about the prince's reform in Hubei, and the people's initiative to "change rice to mulberry" that caused headaches to the court, while the court hoped that the people would "change mulberry to rice".

Then, the old emperor's inclination - if he was not deliberately setting traps for Liu Yu - was actually quite obvious.

Following the old emperor's meaning, Liu Yu perfunctorily communicated, but he mostly said that he was thinking about the emperor, imperial power, and the country.

After perfunctorily dealing with the old emperor, Liu Yu chose to meet the princes of Dashun.

Whether it was the crown prince or the other princes who might be the "ambitious man".

…………

Since it is said that the path that this feudal ruler and ambitious man may take is probably an enhanced version of Na San.

Then, Liu Yu also followed the map and looked for princes who were similar to Na San in thought.

This inevitably caused many ridiculous things.

Laughing and crying.

Embarrassing.

Helpless.

Smile bitterly.

Thinking about it carefully, it is so "unexpected and reasonable".

Because, "following the map" to find, only talking about "thoughts", among the group of princes of Dashun, there are a large number of "horses that fit the picture".

As the saying goes, you reap what you sow.

Such a ridiculous result, after careful examination, is still the seed planted by Liu Yu himself.

…………

Since it is said to be "an enhanced version of Na San".

Then we have to mention the idea of ​​Na San.

In the words of Lao Ma, it is called "using the youthful version of the idea of ​​small-plot land ownership to solve the problem of the already aging small-plot land ownership."

In Dashun's words, it can be called: using the dream of tilling the land to solve the problem of land annexation from the development of tilling the land under private ownership to the aging of the land ownership.

The so-called "youthful version of the idea of ​​small-plot land ownership to solve the aging version of the small-plot land ownership problem" means "thinking that the cause of farmers' bankruptcy should not be explored in the ownership of small plots of land, but should be explored outside of this land ownership, in the influence of some minor circumstances. Then, once his experiment encounters production relations, it will burst like a soap bubble."

In Dashun, this sentence means that the root cause of farmers' bankruptcy has nothing to do with the private ownership of small plots of land. It should be found from problems such as corrupt officials, floods and droughts in the Yellow River, insufficient expansion, etc.

Because if you understand it this way, the root cause of reincarnation is not small-plot land ownership, but other problems.

So, when this set of ideas becomes obsolete, we will continue to use the "youth version" to solve the problem - equal distribution of land, but without touching the private ownership of small plots of land.

So, it goes round and round.

I understand the root of the problem in the "small peasant country" mentioned by Lao Ma.

Then I know that Na San is the emperor who claims to be a "society" and the emperor of progressivism...

Then, in fact, many things will be clear at once.

This also results in that if you "follow the map to find the horse", you will find that Dashun is full of such "horses".

Since we have mentioned Na San, or the enhanced version of Na San.

Then, we have to mention a pamphlet written by Na San when he was in prison, which is regarded as an explanation of his "ism".

And, basically, if you mention Na San, this book is definitely unavoidable.

"On the Elimination of Poverty"

Then, what is this pamphlet about?

If the essence of Na San's thought, "On the Elimination of Poverty", is "map".

Then, when Na Yi was not yet born, why did Dashun have so many "horses" with the same map?

Simply put, the idea of ​​"On the Elimination of Poverty" is very simple:

First point:

The opening clearly states whether to develop industry and commerce?

Answer: Yes.

So-called: [The wealth of a country depends on the prosperity of agriculture and industry, the development of domestic and foreign trade, and the fair and just distribution of public income]

Second point:

Is the private ownership of small plots of land the reason for the limited development of agriculture?

Answer: Yes.

So-called: [Facts have proved that extreme division of property often destroys agriculture]

Third point:

So, should we go back?

What does it mean to go back?

In France, it means whether to go back to the period before the French Revolution? Go back to the feudal ownership of the nobility? Go back to the period before the "primogeniture law" was replaced by the anti-feudal "equal distribution law"?

In Dashun, it means whether to fully restore the past, restore the clan system, restore the feudal inheritance law under the clan system, and forcibly cancel the equal distribution law that has been rolled out among the people?

What should be noted here is that among the many policies of the Legal Reform, the abolition of the patriarchal inheritance law, or the Mosaic inheritance law, has great anti-feudal significance: Why should my elder brother, who was born earlier than me, have the land? Why don’t I have anything?

As for Dashun, among the people - especially if you look at some landowners in the previous dynasty, after they were divided and divided again, many of them became small and medium-sized landowners from thousands of hectares of fertile land - you will know that the elimination of direct descendants was of progressive significance in the French Revolution. The law of primogeniture and equal inheritance has been implemented in Dashun in essence.

Of course, for these Zhongmingdingshi homes in Dashun, that is another matter, which involves the issue of title.

However, the economic power of Dashun’s Zhongming Dingshi House is nothing compared to Dashun’s small-scale peasant society.

On this point, Na San's answer is very firm.

We will never return to the old system, we will never change inheritance laws, and we will never destroy the legacy of the legal revolution.

Putting it in Dashun is equivalent to saying: there will never be a full-scale restoration, there will never be patriarchal inheritance during the restoration, and there will definitely be moral opposition to annexation.

Point 4:

Is industry and commerce too ungrateful, dark, bloody, and lacks the sentiment to treat people as human beings?

Is it the development of industry that crushes human flesh and blood into profit? Is it because the development of business makes people only seek profit and makes people focus on money? All the old benevolence, righteousness and morality are gone?

Answer: Obviously, yes.

So, with so many negative things in industry and commerce, won’t it develop?

Obviously, no.

It is said: [However, in order to combat its shortcomings, should it be strangled to death, regardless of its huge benefits? We believe that to heal a person’s wounds, we only need to treat the wounds]

Point 5:

Is poverty widespread under private ownership of small plots of land? Is it that the rich people are frozen to death due to the smell of wine and meat? Is it that industry and commerce want to develop but cannot?

Answer: Yes.

As the saying goes: [The main problems in the country are that workers get too little; and agricultural production is very insufficient]

[Thus, the country is composed of producers who are unable to sell and hungry people who are unable to consume]

[Such producers who are unable to sell and hungry people who are unable to consume (to develop industry and commerce) force the government to go to China to look for help like the British when there are thousands of French or British people who have lost everything. Thousands of consumers]

[Join, if these French or British people can buy food and suitable clothing, they will be able to create much greater commercial activities and industrial and commercial development than the most advantageous treaty obtained by invading China]

[It is better to let the country’s wealth grow than to go to China to find markets]

Of course, it was very ironic for these words to come out of Nasa's mouth. Because Er Crow, he was the one who fucking started it, and he didn’t solve the problem he said [the country is composed of producers who are unable to sell and hungry people who are unable to consume].

However, these words themselves, as well as Dashun’s reforms in recent years, including Dashun’s voyage to Nanyang, the invasion of India, and participation in World War I...

It should be said that the logic is completely consistent.

The country is composed of producers who are unable to sell and hungry people who are unable to consume. When there are thousands of domestic people who have nothing, they go overseas to find thousands of consumers.

Point six:

Under the small real estate ownership system, will there be a large number of people who "can't find a way out in either cities or rural areas"?

Answer: Yes.

Indeed, under the small real estate ownership system, because lending, mortgages, business speculation, and domestic trade mentioned in the fourth point cannot provide so many industrial and commercial jobs, there has been a large number of people who "cannot find a way out in either cities or rural areas." population.

These people are also human beings and part of society.

We must consider the general well-being of all people in the entire country, in the entire society.

That is to solve and eliminate the problem of poverty.

Point seven:

So, how to eliminate it?

Answer: Go to reclaim wasteland.

If cities cannot accommodate such a large industrial and commercial population, and small real estate ownership in rural areas cannot be touched, then we should go to reclaim wasteland.

Point eight:

Reclamation? Reclamation of wasteland has been around since ancient times. And now you are in an era of rapid industrial and commercial development, and you have to seek benefits for the whole society and the whole people. Is there any difference between your land reclamation and the land reclamation and farming in the past?

Answer: Of course.

First, from a traditional perspective, it is to provide livelihoods for the poor.

From the perspective of the new era, that is, an era in which industry and commerce are increasingly developing, there is another "brilliant" aspect.

First: industrial and commercial development is cyclical. In the event of an economic downturn or the adoption of new technologies, these unemployed people can be resettled.

Second: When a private enterprise needs labor, it needs to provide more favorable remuneration than agricultural expansion, otherwise it will not be able to attract workers. For example, if a person cultivating wasteland earns 10 yuan a day, if a company wants to find someone to work for, and if it pays 9 yuan, who will go?

These two points should be understood from the new era, not from the traditional perspective. This is the biggest difference from reclamation in the past.

Point nine:

Since you know that private ownership of small land is the reason for the insufficient development of agriculture in France, and do not want to go back to before the French Revolution, how are you going to ensure that "reclamation" does not fall into the problem of private ownership of small land?

Answer: Saint-Simon Utopia and agricultural factoryization.

Treat uncultivated wasteland as a factory for producing agricultural products.

On the basis of the existing small land ownership in the country, and relying on the uncultivated wastelands in the world, cooperatives composed of poor people have been built.

The specific operations are as follows: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5...

When industry and commerce develop and people are needed, higher wages are offered in the reclamation cooperatives, and these people will flow to industry and commerce.

When industry and commerce stagnate or are in crisis, people will go to these cooperatives to find shelter.

Through reasonable distribution, the organization of the people, the selection of three elders, etc., everyone can get a fairly good life.

According to my calculations, every year will be like this, and in the future it will be like that...

Finally:

Let us imagine such a future:

[When France does not have enough land at a low enough price, such a village community will establish branches in Algeria and the United States itself; it can invade the world one day! Because wherever there is a hectare of land to be cleared, where there are poor people to feed, there is its capital, its army of workers, and its endless activities]

[In short, the system I propose is the result of all the thoughts and wishes expressed by the most competent economists in the past half century]

[Ah, in a few years, what our organizations often do is to make the poorest class today the richest association in the whole of France]

In the end, in this way, poverty is eliminated.

Of course, this is "classics".

If we only use the "classics" as a map to "follow the map".

It should be said that the reforms of Dashun in recent years, or the many policies guided by Liu Yu's reforms, as well as the many ideas of the practical school, the ideas of immigration and reclamation to solve the problem; coupled with the traditional "people-oriented thought" of Dashun, and the traditional "well-field" retro concept.

Let's put it this way, such "horses" are really a lot.

And just looking at the picture is not enough.

You have to look at the charm.

What is the charm of Na San?

In short: Make France great again.

So, what is this style of "making XX great again"?

Answer:

Use the highest elementary school level of arithmetic to envision the future and paint a big picture.

Don't talk about the scriptures that require a certain level of culture to understand.

You must speak in plain language, and the number of words should be as few as possible so that even foreigners can understand.

Reject any flowery words, simplify and theorize complex problems, and explain the world according to the simple logic of "1+1=2".

And to match this kind of charm, among the many princes of Dashun, it seems that... there is only one person.