Mercenaries and Adventurers

I'm a little dissatisfied with the last few chapters I wrote, and I don't know what I'm writing. So I hope everyone will allow me to slowly and carefully think about some writing issues in the past two days.

The main reason is that I feel that the taste of writing is not right. It lacks the open and free feeling of the previous stories, and it feels a little chaotic and sticky, which can't be said. But I guess the book friends who read this book can feel what I want to say.

In fact, there is an outline of the novel, but it is not too detailed. When the story advances, all the details have to be written out by myself, which leads me to write and write, and all kinds of small details will continue It continues to occupy chapter after chapter after chapter. You may not believe me, but according to my original plan, the content of the crusade against bandits at the beginning of the third volume originally only occupied a small amount of space in this volume, but as it was written, various content details replaced the simple plot in the original plan. It was propped open.

Yes, it’s just opened up. As soon as I typed, I felt that there are countless details and subtleties in the simple storyline. Before the writing power and the primary and secondary needs of the story, I still deleted all kinds of trivial content. . What you see is actually the result of my intentionally ignoring the details. Otherwise, with a simple speaking plot, I can even directly describe all the subtle expressions and verbal reactions of each character.

That's the end of it. Generally speaking, in the dialogue plot, if there are only one or two people talking, then you can describe the details of the two people's expressions in detail at this time, but once the number of people on the field increases, everything will be messed up. It’s because my writing level can’t write it out. Although the lively scene is simulated in my mind, it’s hard to write it out. Secondly, the whole novel has become particularly bloated.

For example, when Lonzos entertained visiting people in the lobby of the small hotel building where he rented, if my writing became bloated, I would introduce each person who spoke, or the people present in turn at the beginning.

Is this introduction carried out from the perspective of God in the third person, or is it carried out from the perspective of Lonzos.

The introduction and description of the individuals on the spot are very different between the two.

If it is unfolded from the perspective of God, then all book friends will have the same information as me that the characters on the stage know very well. But in this way, not to mention the long-winded description to introduce everyone, whether everyone likes to watch it, or finds it boring, just like this, the originally interesting plot becomes meaningless.

If it is launched from the perspective of Lonzos. Due to the difference in intelligence, many people he met for the first time, he did not know, which added a suspense, but, but, this made the respective dialogues and positions less clear, each character It was as if they were wearing a cloak of mist, so what they said became very strange.

In short, when I was writing, sometimes I would think more, and sometimes I couldn’t do it. I felt inexplicable about what I wrote. I couldn’t see it when I was writing. What I think is not the slightest difference from what I write.

Having said all this, I don't even know what I said, anyway, everyone told me to take it easy and look for my status. It will definitely be updated tomorrow. It feels best to listen to the medieval background BGM for a day.