Little Farmer Big Star

Regardless of whether the matter is just like this, Grover's statement is indeed not wrong, and this matter can indeed be discussed and discussed.

If you can find more shooting subjects, it is indeed a good thing.

Therefore, filmmakers from various countries have agreed with this, saying that this is indeed a topic worth discussing.

Countless audiences are also interested in this. They want to know what other themes can be used to make movies?

Grover knew that everyone would agree with his proposal, and it would certainly attract the audience, but this was not his goal, but a premise.

He continued: "We are all big movie countries, and everyone sitting here is also the best filmmaker. Then, it is our responsibility and obligation to find more themes that can be used for filming. Filmmakers from other countries should take the lead and role models. Therefore, I suggest that filmmakers from every country we are here today can find a new theme that has never been filmed before, and successfully shoot it into a movie."

"This..." The filmmakers from various countries looked at each other again, and did not immediately express their opinions.

This is a good thing, but there is obviously a need for discussion. To make a movie, the key is to find investors.

A subject that has never been photographed before is obviously very risky. It is undoubtedly difficult to find investors to invest in such a work.

After all, the purpose of investors investing in filming is to make money, not to do charity work.

If the risk is too great, who would be willing to invest?

Doesn't anyone have to shoot at their own expense without investors? Who has this financial ability and courage?

Most of the filmmakers on the scene do not have such financial ability, and there are so few people with such financial ability, and they will never be willing to do such a thing.

Therefore, in the eyes of many filmmakers, this matter is very necessary for discussion.

However, Grover has already said so. Moreover, he spoke so conscientiously that a large number of media reporters and countless audiences at the scene heard them all.

If they refuse, it will obviously affect the reputation of their country's film industry.

Thinking of this, filmmakers in various countries couldn't help but feel a little annoyed. Grover obviously pushed them onto the fire. They knew that things were not that simple. Didn't this put them in a dilemma?

Moreover, Grover should have prepared such a script long ago, and even found investors.

Otherwise, he would not suggest this way.

Filmmakers in various countries are even more annoyed.

However, the media reporters and countless audiences at the scene were getting more and more excited.

The media reporters found very valuable news, and the audience saw something very interesting, very meaningful, and very worth looking forward to.

Grover's words were not finished. After a while, he continued: "To make things more interesting, I have another suggestion. We all agree on a subject matter. Of course, this subject matter must be something that has not been filmed before. The subject of the past. Then, let’s see whose subject is more difficult and more challenging?

In order that everyone will not deliberately choose a very rare and difficult subject, after we have selected the subject, we must create a script for the subject on the spot, which takes 1 hour.

Of course, it is impossible to complete the entire script in one hour. You only need to design a general story frame. The screenwriters on our scene are all the best screenwriters, so there must be no problem.

Then, through the script we just designed, we look for film investors on the scene and shoot the designed script into a real movie. The time is three months, and the movie will be released three months later. See whose works get higher box office?

Of course, from the selection of the subject matter to the successful release of the final film, there are many difficulties during this period, and everyone can choose to give up at any time. For example, if you design a script and you don’t find a movie investor on the scene, you can choose to give up.

Of course, you don’t have to give up. You can choose to shoot at your own expense if you have the financial means. What do you think of my suggestion? "

"How about the suggestion? Not very good at all." This is the voice of every filmmaker on the scene at this moment. They finally fully understand Grover's intentions. He wants to use them as the background and let him and himself American movies have once again become the focus of the world.

Grover said so much, so and so, but everyone can easily grasp Grover's intentions.

Grover must have prepared a script for a movie theme that has not been filmed before. Even if it is not fully prepared, it must be fully conceived.

Then, he can easily create a general story frame within an hour.

Then, the movie investor should have been determined. After he has created the story frame, the movie investor will be very excited to say that it is a very good story and it will surely sell well at the box office, and then he will be on the spot. signing the contract.

Then, the crew was formed, the filming officially began, and it was successfully released in three months. Everything will go smoothly.

And these will be based on the background of filmmakers from other countries on the scene. They can once again prove to the world that their US is indeed the world's largest film country.

Because other countries will definitely not be able to beat them this time.

Imagine that filmmakers in other countries have to select a subject that has never been filmed before in a short period of time, and within an hour, create a general script for that subject.

In this way, everyone dare not choose too difficult subject matter. Otherwise, the script is not easy to create on the spot. I'm afraid I will lose out here.

And even if it is not too difficult, how good a story can be designed in an hour?

Of course, the story can actually be carefully designed after the exchange meeting is over. The scene actually only needs to determine the subject matter.

But there is a problem, that is, it is necessary to find film investors on the spot. If it is just a subject matter and there is no good story frame, there is absolutely no investor willing to invest.

Even if they are the best filmmakers, it is almost impossible for investors to invest. Unless it is a popular subject, without seeing the script, there may be investors who believe in them and are willing to take a risk and choose to invest.

But unfortunately it is not a popular subject, but a subject that has never been photographed before.

A subject that hasn't been filmed yet. It must be a very unpopular subject. Are there any audiences interested in watching it? It's really hard to be sure.

Investors can never take risks because of this.

Therefore, if you want to attract investors to invest, you can only come up with a story frame that allows investors to see hope.

Otherwise, you can only choose to give up on site or shoot at your own expense.

And this is undoubtedly a very embarrassing thing. They represent the film industry in their respective countries. They are the best filmmakers in their country, which makes it difficult for them to accept.

And if you choose to shoot at your own expense, let alone whether you have the financial ability, the key is whether the film can be successfully released after it is shot?

Wouldn’t it be even more embarrassing if the movie was shot but it could not be released successfully, or the box office was extremely bleak after it was released?

Moreover, choosing to shoot at your own expense is actually very embarrassing, because choosing self-funding means that no investors are willing to invest, but it is better than simply giving up.

How should this be good?

...