Lawyer's character

From the beginning of this year to the end of June, the man surnamed Wu kept calling Zhao Cuixia to ask if she had any good game, but Zhao Cuixia said no.

It was not until early July that the upstream seller Liu Sanding contacted Zhao Cuixia and said that he had good game on hand, but he needed a deposit of 5,000 yuan first. Afterwards, Zhao Cuixia called the man surnamed Wu and told him that he had the good game he wanted, but a deposit of 5,000 yuan was required.

Later, the man surnamed Wu sent a deposit of 5,000 yuan to Zhao Cuixia's restaurant. At around eight o'clock that night, Liu Sanding delivered the two whooper swans to Zhao Cuixia's restaurant.

At that time, Zhao Cuixia was afraid that the man surnamed Wu would not like the big swan, so she put down the deposit and did not give it to Liu Sand. In this kind of business, the most important thing is to follow the rules. No matter what the law stipulates about the deposit, if the other party does not like the game, Zhao Cuixia only has two Choices: 1. Make the deposit for free, but you have to bear the consequences. I am afraid that no one will do business with him again in the future; 2. Return the money. This is the wisest choice. After all, it is only a few thousand yuan, so there is no need to fall out.

After Zhao Cuixia got the game, she called the man surnamed Wu and asked him to come to the restaurant to pick up the food the next afternoon, paying for it and picking up the food. The man surnamed Wu rushed to Zhao Cuixia's restaurant at 19:20 the next day. After inspecting the goods, he accepted the two whooper swans.

Just as Zhao Cuixia was asking the man surnamed Wu for hard work, a group of police officers suddenly rushed in and arrested Zhao Cuixia on the spot. Seeing the man surnamed Wu talking and laughing with the police, it was only then that Zhao Cuixia realized that she had been deceived.

After identification, the frozen animal involved in the case was the whooper swan, a national second-class protected wild animal.

"Sister-in-law, do you know what the man named Wu does?" Fang Yi asked.

"It seems to be from the Forest Public Security Bureau. Yes, it is a police officer from the Forest Public Security Bureau. Even if he is not one of them, he is still someone arranged by them. At that time, I remember someone patted Wu on the shoulder and said that he had made a meritorious service." Zhao Cuixia said.

"So, you were taken advantage of by the other party!" Fang Yi said.

"Fishing? No fishing! What do you mean?" Zhao Cuixia said in confusion.

"It's okay, I understand. Does the previous lawyer Zhang know these things?" Fang Yi asked.

"Zhang Datou came here once, but before I could finish my words, he told me that the case was not easy to solve. The police had evidence and I had to be honest and frank and strive for leniency." Zhao Cuixia said.

Fang Yi smacked his lips but didn't say anything. He didn't want to criticize other lawyers in front of the client, because this would make the client think he was unqualified, and he didn't think that stepping on the feet of his peers would improve his status. , the status of a lawyer in the heart of the client is achieved by his own actions, not by his mouth, let alone by belittling others.

…

After returning from the detention center, Fang Yi began to draft an appeal petition and analyze the case. Two days before the expiration of the appeal period, Fang Yi went to the detention center again to check the case again, and then went to the court to submit the appeal petition. .

On Monday, Hao Lianying's case came to trial. Fang Yi was sitting in the courtroom. The man sitting opposite the plaintiff's table was Hao Lianying's ex-husband. Maybe because he thought he could handle it, he didn't spend money to hire a lawyer.

The plaintiff is quite handsome, with a slightly thin figure, a bare mouth and no beard, which is in line with the aesthetic standards of contemporary little girls.

Fang Yi thought to himself: How can a person who looks quite normal be so cold?

The judge who heard the case was a female judge in her twenties. She wore gold-rimmed glasses and looked serious and serious.

…

"Plaintiff, state the claims, facts and reasons." The female judge rolled her eyes and said.

“The lawsuit demands: 1. Request that the defendant be ordered to apologize to the plaintiff in WeChat Moments; 2. Request that the defendant be ordered to compensate the plaintiff 30,000 yuan for mental losses; 3. The litigation costs of this case shall be borne by the defendant.

Facts and reasons: ...the defendant went behind the plaintiff’s back and told his friends about the plaintiff’s private life during their marriage. He repeatedly talked about plaintiff X’s coldness and other issues involving the plaintiff’s privacy.

The plaintiff believes that the defendant's above-mentioned behavior has seriously affected his personal image, caused a serious mental burden on the plaintiff, and violated the plaintiff's personal privacy and reputation rights. He requests the court to uphold the plaintiff's claims in accordance with the law. "The plaintiff said.

Fang Yi was sure that the plaintiff must have consulted a lawyer before the trial, and the complaint was also drafted by a lawyer.

"The defendant pleads," the female judge said.

“The defendant disagrees with the plaintiff’s claim for the following reasons:

The defendant and his friends confided in a closed environment about their unhappy lives, which was actually a complaint between friends about their unsatisfactory lives.

The content of their conversation was not known to the public, and there was no subjective fault of exposing it to the public or intentionally disclosing it. Moreover, the content of the chat was only known to both parties in the conversation. There was no blatant vilification of the plaintiff’s personality and reputation, nor did it cause any harm to the plaintiff’s social status. Ratings were lowered. Ask the court to reject the plaintiff’s claim in accordance with the law. "Fang Yi said.

"Now let's start the presentation of evidence and cross-examination. The plaintiff will present evidence," the female judge said.

“Evidence one, the divorce certificate, proves that the original defendant and the defendant are divorced and there is no husband-wife relationship.

Evidence two, the driving recorder recording, proves that the defendant has defamed the plaintiff.

Judge, I'm done. "The plaintiff said.

"The defendant cross-examined," the female judge said.

"The defendant accepts both evidence submitted by the plaintiff, but does not admit the purpose of evidence two. The driving recorder recording is the defendant confiding to his friends about the difficulties of life, and does not intend to slander the plaintiff. Over." Fang Yidao .

"The defendant gave evidence." the female judge said.

"The defendant has no evidence to submit."

Whoever makes the claim must provide evidence. Fang Yi represents the defendant. As long as he denies the plaintiff's request, there is no evidence to submit in this case.

"Plaintiff, how did you obtain the driving recorder?" the female judge asked.

"The driving recorder belongs to me and is installed in my car. The defendant drove my car to go out for fun. They chatted in my car and were recorded by my driving recorder. That's it," the plaintiff said.

"In other words, the defendant was talking about your privacy with friends in the car, is that right? Plaintiff!" The female judge looked at the plaintiff.

"Yes, that should be the case." said the plaintiff.

"Defendant, is that so?" the female judge looked at Fang Yi and asked.

"Yes." Fang Yi said.

"Defendant, who was in the car at that time? How many people were there? Was the car driving at that time?" the female judge asked.

"There were two people in the car, one was the defendant and the other was the defendant's friend. The car was driving. This can be seen from the audio and video in the driving recorder. While the two were chatting, the car was moving quickly on the road. ." Fang Yi said.

"Plaintiff, do you have any objection to what the defendant just said?" the female judge asked.