NBA bad guys

LeBron James has absolutely no reason to be elected as the Rookie of the Year this year.

No matter from which angle you look at it, this year's Rookie of the Year winner should go to Carmelo Anthony.

Whether in terms of basic data or team record, Carmelo Anthony is more dominant.

Therefore, let’s stop saying that LeBron James was not praised, but was completely crushed by his strength and won career honors.

In fact, to prove that this theory is correct, there is another piece of evidence.

That's the World Series.

Can the team led by LeBron James achieve any outstanding results on the world stage?

The answer is obvious, they didn't give any good results at all.

So in other words, he is nothing.

Some people would say, why should we look at the results on the world stage?

In fact, it is very simple. The world stage is not a pure business alliance. It is really whoever is stronger has the final say. So if you look carefully based on this, you will not be able to see that in such a world In front of the sexual stage, what kind of quality is LeBron James?

It can be said that LeBron James is nothing.

Of course, this point of view cannot be completely seen. It is really impossible to say that it is LeBron James.

To say here that LeBron James is not good is to prove it through various arguments. This is just one direction.

Allen Iverson doesn't want to say too much about this matter. It doesn't make any sense.

Allen Iverson continued: "So, what I want to tell you is that a player must not only be bloody, but also smart, and Wu Liang is the smart one. He knows When and how you should play the ball. On the contrary, you, Jerry Stackhouse, are the very stupid one. You can only think that the opponent wants to score by attacking the basket.

In fact, Wu Liang has already gone one step further in your thinking.

do you know?

You are already one point behind. "

Jerry Stackhouse was very angry at Wu Liang's words, but he didn't know where to refute. After all, Wu Liang did score from his own head, and they were two mid-range shots.

The reason is the same as what Allen Iverson said, that is, he really thought that Wu Liang relied on breakthroughs to cause damage, but what he didn't expect was that this guy really didn't do that, but instead. Really just rely on shooting to solve the problem.

Jerry Stackhouse felt that he was very aggrieved, but how could he be willing to be so aggrieved, so he still said coldly: "Allen Iverson, I think what you said That's just not right. He was able to shoot just because he was lucky. This has nothing to do with my defensive strategy. If I hadn't been the one to defend, and if someone else had been the one to defend Wu Liang, the current situation would have been It could be even worse, what do you say?"

Allen Iverson completely didn't expect that Jerry Stackhouse in front of him could be so shameless, but he really didn't want to say anything, while Allen Iverson was vicious Said: "Listen to me, first of all, I have told you that Wu Liang's mid-range shooting is quite stable.

If it's a player like Shaquille O'Neal, his free throws are particularly bad, but if you say he shoots from mid-range, then your strategic meaning is correct. After all, no one can do a player like him. Believe it, otherwise no one would use the shark-killing tactic. "

As the name suggests, the "shark-killing tactic" is a tactic invented for "Big Shark" O'Neal. Because O'Neal has no solution in the paint but suffers from the fatal penalty of free throw difference, many teams will foul O'Neal without the ball and send him to the free throw line. However, this tactic has gradually declined since O'Neal retired.

Tactics similar to the shark-cutting tactic had been used as early as the Wilt Chamberlain era. At that time, the main target was Chamberlain (so it was called the Zhang-cutting tactic at that time).

This tactic is not just for centers, but for players who are poor at free throws but very lethal. For players such as Bruce Bowen who have no offensive ability but are also poor at free throws, this tactic can also be used to obtain the ball.

Therefore, in a broad sense, the shark-cutting tactic is not aimed at O'Neal alone. When this tactic is targeted at other players, it can also be called the "X-cutting tactic" (X is the name of the target, such as when targeting Ben Wallace). "Capital-killing tactics") or simply "people-killing tactics." In Taiwan, it is called "hacker tactics" (note: hacker is the transliteration of English hack, which means hacking).

As we all know, the most famous example of the shark-cutting tactic is the method designed to "impede" Shaq's scoring in response to his appalling free throw percentage. Its name is believed to come from the original NBA Dallas Mavericks (Note: Maverick, popular among fans) The habit is often referred to here as a special defensive tactic designed by Don Nelson, head coach of the Mavericks, against the Chicago Bulls. However, the tactic eventually became familiar against center Shaq and his Los Angeles Lakers team. Arguably, the core of this play was an intentional "physical assault" on poor Shaq every time the Lakers had the ball for a period of time.

Allen Iverson continued: "But Jerry Stackhouse, you have to listen to me, Wu Liang is not such a player now.

Wu Liang is now a mid-range shooting threat like Michael Jordan. Don't tell me, facing such a person, you still have to choose to prevent him from shooting?

If you can really choose this tactic to deal with him, then I can only say that your tactic is completely wrong. Do you understand? "

Jerry Stackhouse said coldly: "Hey, I just think there are some problems with what you said. I don't think what you said is completely correct. I think what you said is more or less correct. There are some problems, do you understand what I mean?”

Allen Iverson said: "I really can't tolerate the mistakes you made before. If you don't believe it, you can take a look at your next offensive round. It's really too bad." It stinks.

Don't you still see that Wu Liang is guarding against your breakthrough? He has grasped your psychology, seen your thoughts, and knows that you will only break through no matter what, and will never choose Mid-range shooting, so he has been guarding you for a few steps, but you didn't read the opponent's defense, and still just broke through inside. Really, your approach is really disappointing, and It's so outrageous. "

After listening to Allen Iverson's words, the rest of the people nodded.

In fact, most people were dissatisfied with Jerry Stackhouse's previous actions, but they were all out of face, so they didn't speak out.

Jerry Stackhouse really didn't want to listen to Allen Iverson anymore. They were simply going too far. Then he said angrily: "I mean Allen, I don't think so in this situation." It's normal. I just wanted to hit the basket and score. And in my opinion at the time, even if I didn't score a layup, I could still cause damage and then go to the free throw line. What's wrong with that? What about?"