Abandoned after first marriage due to infertility, married into a wealthy family and had two childre

Hu Yu: "She is responsible for instructing Zhou Ming to drive drunk! After talking about objective behavior, let's talk about causality. I would like to ask the opposing debater, without Li Fang's behavior, would the accident have happened?"

Bai Xiaowei: "Since you are talking about causality, then I would like to ask the other debater, is causality equivalent to sequence?"

Hu Yu: "Causation is certainly not the same as order. Why don't you explain to us what causation is in criminal law?"

Bai Xiaowei: "The causal relationship in criminal law is different from the causal relationship in life. It is a regular cause-and-effect relationship that is objective and relative. May I ask, is the cause of the cause the cause of the result?"

【?_?! 】

【| ???w??)???】

【...】

The two sides on the field exchanged sharp words with each other, and the game was very intense!

Hu Yu occasionally made mistakes, and Bai Xiaowei seized the opportunity to counterattack. Although he was caught by the judges, he quickly made up for it, and the onlookers who were listening to the excitement naturally did not notice it.

The audience's expressions included confusion, shock, and mostly admiration.

They didn't expect that the two prosecutors could think so deeply about a topic so close to life.

Ex-girlfriend urging people to drink, drunk driving, traffic accidents...anyone can say something about it.

However, if they were to face the two prosecutors on the field, they might not be able to last more than three rounds!

What is a crime of negligence? What is a crime of intent?

What is causation? What is an abettor?

And there is that sentence: Is the cause of the cause the cause of the result?

Many people don’t understand, did Li Fang not instigate in this case?

She was an instigator - she instigated Zhou Ming to drink and drive after drinking. If this is not instigation, what is it?

However, she only instigated Zhou Ming to drive after drinking.

In other words, did she instigate Zhou Ming to run a red light?

Did she instigate Zhou Ming to hit pedestrians when he saw them?

nothing!

Perhaps Zhou Ming was drunk and did not see the red light.

Perhaps Zhou Ming was drunk and did not see the pedestrians crossing the road.

Or perhaps Zhou Ming was too confident in his driving skills and thought he would avoid pedestrians even if he ran a red light.

Just one thought, one moment, and tragedy has happened!

In such a short time, let alone Li Fang in the co-pilot seat, even Zhou Ming himself would have enough time to react?

Going further back, we can also see from the conversation between Zhou Ming and Li Fang that Zhou Ming was conscious before driving and was clearly aware of the consequences of drunk driving.

There is no doubt that a person who fully enjoys the right to choose independently chooses to take risks just because he can't save face and can't let go of his former lover, which constitutes a crime!

So, the question is, how do you evaluate Li Fang’s behavior?

Noble.

Gu Wenrui drank the wine in the glass comfortably, but he felt an itchy and hot feeling in his heart.

He wanted to tell the world that this bright and intelligent woman belonged to him...

"Dong dong dong!" There was a knock on the door.

He raised his voice impatiently: "Get out!"

Outside the door, Gu Jiu: "......"

Gu family.

Gu Wenxing had already transformed into a little fan girl, blinking her starry eyes and staring closely at Bai Xiaowei, who was neither impatient nor anxious and calm on the court.

Gu Wenjin was so shocked that he couldn't speak.

She prides herself on her eloquence and is hard to rival in the circle of noble ladies!

As a result, she gained a reputation of being "uneducated and unsuitable for marriage".

But today she truly knew what true eloquence was!

She thought hard for a long time. Isn't the cause and effect a relationship of sequence? Isn't the cause happening first and the effect later?

What is the difference between causation and sequence?

Thinking of this, she asked.

Gu Wenxing, who was watching the game, turned his head reluctantly: "My parents came first, and then you. Can you say that your parents are the reason for you, and you are the result of your parents?"

"You eat first and then take a bath. Does that mean that the reason you take a bath is to eat? Or is the result of eating the bath?"

Gu Wenjin: “…”

Everyone in the Gu family tacitly remained silent.

Gu Wenxing didn't know if his explanation was correct. He finished quickly and turned around to continue watching the game.

Renting a house in a dilapidated neighborhood.

Yi Hong rested his chin on his hand and looked at the sharp-tongued Bai Xiaowei on the screen, the interest in his dark eyes becoming more intense...

On the field.

Hu Yu: "We strongly agree that causality is a lawful relationship of cause and effect. Zhou Ming's choice was precisely caused by Li Fang's instigation. Opponents, please do not ignore the basic facts."

Bai Xiaowei: "How can this be in line with the rules? Today Zhou Ming made a choice, but tomorrow Zhou Ming's real girlfriend appears and he will not make a choice. In the end, it depends on the person. People's thoughts change rapidly. Is this still a rule?"

Hu Yu: "We have already said that Zhou Ming was the choice, but who made him choose? It was Li Fang! Li Fang's instructions are so powerful!"

Bai Xiaowei: "The other debater has not answered me yet. Is the cause of the cause the cause of the result?"

Hu Yu: "We have reiterated many times that without Li Fang's instigation, Zhou Ming would not have driven under the influence of alcohol, and there would not have been one death and one injury!"

Bai Xiaowei: “Okay, thank you for telling us that one action leads to another action, which in turn causes a consequence, and this is the so-called causal relationship.

Following this logic, I can also give an example. During the Qin Dynasty, a heavy rain delayed the border defense, which led to the Chen Sheng and Wu Guang uprising, and then caused the fall of the Qin Dynasty. Can we say that the fall of the Qin Dynasty was due to a heavy rain? "

Hu Yu: "Please do not deviate from this case. We say that without Li Fang's instigation, the accident would not have happened. This is the causal relationship.

After discussing the causal relationship, let's talk about subjective fault. The other debater believes that Li Fang has no subjective fault. Is it because she has no foresight or no duty of care? "

Bai Xiaowei: "Don't be impatient, my opponent. We haven't finished discussing the cause and effect relationship. There is also a relativity in this case. I would like to ask for the third time, is the cause of the cause the cause of the result? Please answer directly, don't evade it!"

Hu Yu: "Since the other debaters have repeatedly emphasized this, I will give a direct answer. The causal relationship in criminal law is relative. The cause of the cause is certainly not the cause of the result!

But in this case, we say that Li Fang is responsible because she instructed others to do something. My opponent, I noticed that you mentioned in your opening statement that Li Fang asked Zhou Ming to be careful. Does that mean that Li Fang has already seen that the harmful consequences may happen at any time, so she wants to remind him?"

Bai Xiaowei: "Instigation? What a familiar word! You have already told us that instigation means to instigate and provoke. So, I would like to ask you to clarify again, is Li Fang an instigator? Are Zhou Ming and Li Fang co-conspirators?"

Hu Yu: "Zhou Ming and Li Fang are not co-conspirators! Li Fang is not an instigator! Li Fang alone is guilty of causing a traffic accident! However, Li Fang did violate the Road Traffic Safety Law. Did she cause any harmful consequences?"

Bai Xiaowei: "Illegal behavior does not necessarily lead to crime. Zhou Ming chose to drive drunk, resulting in one death and one injury. It is only right that we punish Zhou Ming for the crime of traffic accident.

Moreover, you repeatedly emphasized the words "directing" and "commanding", and said that the two people did not commit a joint crime. Then I wonder, can a person make a car start just by verbally directing? Can she talk someone to death? Weren't the two people in this case killed or injured by the car? "