Reborn in 2011, 985 missing from two copies

In order to completely destroy the iPad, Wang Yi once again held a high-level meeting to make the final decision before listing:

"Xpad 1 will be launched soon. Today we will confirm the final launch price. What do you think?"

As the R&D director of Xpad 1, Zhu Changlin was the first to speak:

"Chairman, I have considered this issue. Since the main competitor of Xpad 1 is the upcoming third generation iPad, the price of Xpad 1 must also be determined based on the third generation iPad!"

As he spoke, Zhu Changlin opened his notebook and projected it on the big screen:

"The third generation iPad has not yet been launched, but according to Apple's style, the pricing strategy of the third generation should be similar to the second generation iPad launched last year."

"As shown in the picture: 16G version 3688, 32G version 4488, 64G version 5288. It is still an upgrade to a storage level, and the price increase is 800, which is not bad."

"However, it is precisely because Apple is so evil that it seems that our Xphone 1 upgrade costs 500 more for each upgrade, which is very conscientious."

Everyone laughed, all thanks to their peers.

Zhu Changlin continued: "Based on the estimated selling price of the third generation iPad, I recommend the standard version of the Xingyi Xpad 1, which is priced lower than the iPad. The 16G version is 2999, and comes with a two-year membership of Xingyi Video and Xingyi Music worth 2699. Equivalent to !”

“32G版本的xpad 1售价3499，64G版本3999，全部送双年会员。”

"In this way, each Xpad 1 is 700 yuan cheaper than the third-generation iPad of the same grade. In addition to the free bi-annual membership worth 300 yuan, it is a thousand yuan cheaper! It is quite cost-effective!"

“至于旗舰版的四核xpad 1pro，售价对标ipad。16G版本的xpad 1pro，3999送双年会员。32G版本4499送双年会员，64G版本4999送双年会员！”

Hearing this, a senior executive couldn't help but said: "This pricing strategy is one high and one low, attacking Apple both front and back. I agree with it. But there is a problem. Users who have already bought an how?"

Zhu Changlin said: "Users who already have biennial memberships are fine, they can directly add membership time!"

Then, another senior executive raised a question: "Then the foreign version is a problem. Xingyi !”

"This..." Zhu Changlin was silent.

Yes, most of the content in Xingyi Video and Xingyi Music is what Chinese people need.

Many foreign users don’t even understand Chinese, so Xingyi Video and Xingyi Music are of little use!

This is indeed a problem.

Someone else suggested: "How about giving away two memberships in China and directly reducing the price by 300 yuan abroad?"

Wang Yi waved his hand: "There is no need to reduce the price, just give away a bi-annual membership of 300 yuan. If it is not used abroad, then the 300 yuan will be regarded as the price increase of Xpad overseas, and there will be no additional two times." The price has increased.”

Clothes from Meiyou and Zhenyou are priced a lot higher overseas.

But electronic products are different. The price increase is too much, and it is one or two thousand more expensive than the iPad, so the sales volume will not be better.

Otherwise, why don’t people buy cheaper iPads?

If you want to overtake the iPad, you have to increase the volume and sell it at the same price as the iPad!

As for surpassing the iPad and selling at a premium, that will only happen after the iPad is overturned and the Xingyi Pad brand is established and becomes famous all over the world.

At present, Xingyi Xpad 1 has just started, and it does not have the strength yet. If it can be sold at a price similar to that of iPad, it is already very successful.

What's more, there is still a big gap between Xpad 1 and Xpad at the system level.

The iOS 5.1 system of the third generation of iapd is definitely more powerful than Android 4.0.

This is the biggest dilemma that restricts Xpad 1 and even Xingyi mobile phones!

The simplest one, ios5.1+1G running memory, is not stuck now and will not be stuck in two years.

As for Android 4.0+1G running memory, it is still okay at present, let alone two years from now, it will be sluggish in one year.

It is precisely for this reason that most current Android phones and tablets are replaced and upgraded once a year.

And Apple's low storage capacity can be used for many years without lag.

Of course, the most essential thing is that the iOS system is a pseudo background, while Android is the real background.

Software started by the Android system will be kept in the background. The more it is started, the more resources it takes up and the more lag it will naturally get.

Apple, on the other hand, uses a pseudo-backend with a tombstone mechanism. Once the screen is locked, background programs will continue to run except for music and other applications. Most other applications will be suspended directly and will not stay in the background to continue running. Naturally, they will occupy less memory and will not be used as much. Card.

But if you go in again, you have to reload.

Apple does not freeze, and Android does not kill the background. Both mechanisms have their own merits, and it can be said that each is not perfect.

The East pays attention to the golden mean. Everything should not be too left or too right. This is actually great wisdom.

It’s not good for Apple to leave no background, and it’s not conducive to gaming parties.

Android's backend is not good either. It's easy to get stuck after using it for a long time. If you don't refresh it for a year, it won't work anymore and you'll have to change your phone!

The real ideal state is an intelligent backend!

Through accurate identification, all applications are identified. Applications that should be kept in the background, such as games, social software, etc., should continue to be kept in the background and do not delay users' use.

If you need to kill other applications that are of little significance, kill them. Don’t keep them occupying memory and CPU!

For example, portal apps, Sohu.com, Sina.com, NetEase News, etc., there is no point in keeping them occupying the backend. After the user returns, they can be killed directly.

Wait for the user to click in again and hang it up again!

There are also some softwares that automatically start or link to start, seizing storage resources, which is a big pitfall for Android.

The random push mechanism is also a cancer of Android.

They are all objects that must be killed.

However, this requires powerful permissions to uniformly manage the self-start, linked startup, push management, and process management of all applications.

Apple does this very well, but Android is rubbish.

Let alone Android 4.0, even Android 7.0 can’t do it well.

The Android manufacturer's solution is also decisive. If I can't control it, then I will.

Aren’t they all grabbing memory? Isn't there not enough memory?

Then I will add memory like crazy.

The iPhone 4s has 512M of memory, and the Android phone of the same period has 1G of memory.

The iPhone 5 was upgraded to 1G of memory, while Xiaomi 2 and other Android phones at the same time had 2G of memory.

一直到iPhone 6依旧是1G内存，而同期的小米4，华为mate 7则是3G内存。

Later, the iPhone 15 had 6G of memory, and the Android flagship of the same period had 16G of memory!

However, this barbaric method of memory growth is only a temporary solution and is forced.

For example, the current Xpad 1 system is not as good as iOS 5.1. Wang Yi has no choice but to upgrade the memory.

ipad三代1G内存，而xpad 1标准版的内存则是1.5G，xpad 1 pro更是直接2G内存。

Only in this way can the disadvantages be restored when the system is not as good as Apple's.

But this treats the symptoms rather than the root cause.

Moreover, memory upgrades also take time.