full-time artist

"I can accept spoilers, but I don't accept Poirot's death!"

"..."

Silver blue library.

reasoning department.

Cao Dezhi sat in front of the computer with a wry smile.

From time to time, there were hurried voices at the door——

"Editor-in-Chief, the department's phone line is going to be blown up by readers!"

"Editor-in-Chief, a reader just called and scolded me for 10 minutes, what's none of my business!"

"Editor-in-chief, I can't answer the phone, and I'm trying to make Chu Kuang change the ending."

"Editor-in-chief, why don't you find Teacher Chu Kuang..."

"Editor-in-Chief, the reader threatened to withdraw the book, why did he call our company, go and quarrel with the bookstore..."

"The editor-in-chief..."

Cao Dezhi slammed the door shut.

don't call me!

Is it useful to call me?

What the hell is this called?

at this time.

Cao Dezhi's phone rang too.

After Cao Dezhi connected, the voice of the old bear from the fantasy department came from the opposite side: "Your side is going to be turned upside down..."

"You come to see me too!"

Cao Dezhi's mood was very unstable.

Old Xiong sighed: "I just want to tell you, "I just want to tell you that our department has also experienced this."

Cao Dezhi was taken aback for a moment.

Old Xiong said helplessly: "This is not the first time that Chu Kuang has abused readers. Back then, "Zhu Xian" was so popular, but in the end he killed Baguio and affected sales for several months. You are not bad. At least he sent the blade in the finale."

"Then how did you deal with it in the end?"

Cao Dezhi also heard about what happened at that time.

Old Xiong curled his lips: "How can we deal with it? Let's just leave it alone. Readers make a fuss, and let it go. In the end, we still have to accept that Chu Kuang will listen to us. And I think this ending is actually a good ending."

Cao Dezhi: "..."

Readers think like you do.

In fact, Cao Dezhi also felt that this ending was okay.

only……

Emotionally unacceptable.

Some readers even clamored that Chu Kuang was the murderer who killed Poirot!

Ok.

There is nothing wrong with this reasoning.

Also.

There are also countless controversies about Poirot's incarnation of a murderer in the finale, and his behavior of using violence to control violence:

"How could Poirot be so extreme!"

"Chu Kuang's arrangement is too much!"

"I would rather Poirot die a normal life than see him die in such a tragic way. He violated the law that he had defended all his life."

"How can this be..."

"Why do you want to do this..."

"I don't believe that Poirot will have nothing to do with the murderer. There is not enough toilet paper. This is the first time I cry like this for a virtual character."

"..."

And just when the readers are rioting.

At the beginning, he launched a literary fight against Chu Kuang, but Chu Kuang used "Murder on the Orient Express" to counterattack so sharply that Leng Guang, who was defeated so badly, suddenly posted three updates intermittently.

Article [-]: "Chu Kuang violated the rule that a detective cannot become a murderer!"

Two 10 minutes later.

Number two: "Another Murder on the Orient Express!"

after an hour.

The third: "This is the best ending for Poirot."

It seems that Leng Guang also experienced complicated psychological struggles, but in the end, Leng Guang still approved the finale of "Detective Poirot".

What the hell!

Netizens were dumbfounded.

what?

Chu Kuang wrote Poirot to death, and made Poirot a murderer, violating the rules you set yourself...

In the end, you still said that this ending is good?

Cold light, aren't you a big troll!

Aren't you the most disgusted by others writing like this?

I didn't expect that you, with thick eyebrows and big eyes, would also betray you?

Brush brush!

Some angry netizens began to rush at the cold light, and the hottest comment with the highest praise was:

"You have been publicized by Chu Kuang!"

Unexpectedly, Leng Guang responded to this hot comment:

"With Poirot's abilities, he could have made Norton's death a perfect crime, but he didn't. Poirot made a difficult choice, either to give up his most cherished friend, or to let this villain continue to die. As for those who say that Poirot can’t do this kind of thing, I suggest you go back and read "Murder on the Orient Express" to see what Poirot chose at that time!"

Some netizens were stunned.

Immediately afterwards, I suddenly woke up!

--------

ps: Thank you Huowu Chifeng for the second leader's reward, plus more, and Wubai will continue to write tomorrow's first update.

Chapter 485 It turns out that I dug a hole a long time ago

Yes.

Among the cases solved by Poirot, it is the most famous and most talked about by readers——

It's Murder on the Orient Express!

In Murder on the Orient Express, Poirot chooses to let the murderer go.

Because the law cannot sanction the murderer who is at large, a group of people took up the butcher's knife and killed the murderer with a shocking partnership.

Violence with violence!

After Poirot found out the truth, he hesitated for a long time, but in the end he did not report this group of people.

The way Poirot handled it at the time caused controversy.

But in "The Curtain", another murderer who cannot be sanctioned by the law appeared.

The murderer used the psychological weakness of others to instigate others to kill, while he himself stood on the sidelines from a distance.

It can be called an outlaw fanatic!

He even provoked Poirot's friend Hastings to kill someone!

If Poirot hadn't noticed, Hastings would have become a murderer.

If Poirot can't punish the opponent, the opponent will only continue to go crazy.

Under such circumstances, Poirot made the same choice as the murderers in "Murder on the Orient Express"——

Violence with violence!

For better or worse.

At least this behavior did not violate Poirot's personality, but made Poirot's personality stronger!

Yes.

He can forgive those people, because at the same dark moment, he will make the same extreme choice!

And the difference is...

Poirot could forgive others for using violence to punish the murderer, but he could not forgive himself for using this method.

So after he killed the murderer, he committed suicide without hesitation.

He is using his own way to die with the murderer!

And this is precisely the greatness of Poirot!

Realize this.

Many people were silent.

The scolding against Chu Kuang was also suddenly silent.

With that story as a base, many people's criticisms are not true at all.

It's just that everyone didn't expect it.

It turned out that Chu Kuang had already shown this to everyone in "Murder on the Orient Express", and he had already been digging holes.

The difference is that those people still want to live after using violence to control violence.

Poirot, on the other hand, chose to use death as his salvation.

He feels guilty about himself.

He violated the code of his life.

In making this decision, he negates what has been his most steadfast tenure as a detective.

But here was Poirot!

The meaning of this layout is so profound that it can almost shock people's hearts!

The seemingly unconnected stories have formed a complete chain of thinking because of two choices with the same purpose——

Echoed around!

And when making these two choices, Poirot said four words repeatedly.

"I have no idea……"

He doesn't know how to deal with others, and he doesn't know whether his choice is correct.

There was no case in the world that could stump Poirot.

What stumped him was only the contradictions about human nature.

Is this ending acceptable now?

Readers don't know either.

But the scolding has indeed become smaller and smaller.

The reader's riot gradually subsided because of the "Murder on the Orient Express" mentioned in a cold light.