I became the son of Renzong

This kind of court debate allows them to try to understand the ideas of each family...~ The basis for finding mistakes is to understand the core of others.

The result of the debate has always been that each person retains his own point of view.

When establishing a school of thought, especially at this start-up stage, the system has not yet been fully formed, and citations and textual research are limited.

Even if Zhao Xi doesn't care about listening to their chatter all the time, let alone taking care of food and housing, it's still time for him to complain.

Zhang Zai was the first to leave the battlefield.Zhang Zai's strength is too weak.

The official position is not high, the influence is not great, and the literary movement in the Northwest is not obvious. In the entire Daqing Palace, there are too few officials and scholars who support his views.

Zhang Zai has not yet perfected his theoretical system. The key is that he has not used scientific experiments to verify his theory...~ This is the root cause of Zhao Xi's belief that he was defeated.

Another point that cannot be ignored is that Zhang Zai studied under Zhou Dunyi, or that his theory was extracted from a certain point of Zhou Dunyi's theory.

If he continues to argue, he can only find a foothold in Zhou Dunyi's theory.Such a result may directly bury his so-called Guan Xue and become a collateral branch of Zhou Dunyi's academics.

Zhang Zai's withdrawal is the smartest way.There is no victory or defeat in the debate, as long as the point of view is expounded in the court debate, it is already the greatest victory for Zhang Zai, a school whose influence is limited to Hengqu.

The one who stopped arguing next was Zhou Dunyi.The reason why he stopped arguing was because he was released by Er Cheng, who had the same philosophy as himself.

This is really impossible.I once heard the story that Ercheng also had a teacher Zhou Dunyi, but now it seems that this is not the case.

In two close points of view, the more detailed and specific, the more convincing.

This is how Ercheng was to Zhou Dunyi.

The two academics are one purpose, or a core essence.Zhou Dunyi talked in general terms, while Er Cheng was equivalent to clarifying his views.

Perhaps Zhou Dunyi cared more about academic inheritance, and had no intention of competing, nor did he consider the emperor's views and impressions of him.

Whether the person who wrote "Ai Lian Shuo" really has an extraordinary character, no one knows, anyway, so be it.

This is just the result, as for the process... two days have passed.

Fortunately, each school is not supported by one person, otherwise, if you talk for two days in a row, your voice will probably be useless.

It's been two days, the court has not done any shit, and just listened to people's nonsense.Zhao Xi had thought about this issue long ago, and the date was set at Xiumu's time... But in the eyes of the courtiers, it seemed that this nonsense matter was more important than dealing with the government affairs.

Chapter 429

Later generations have a reference to Wang Anshi, which is called Yi Xianggong.

But in the course of this court debate, Zhao Xi discovered that Sima Guang's obsession was not less than Wang Anshi's.

Wang Anshi's theory is based on changes, which has great advantages.

Not to mention the vicissitudes of life, but to talk about the annotations of the classics and history subsets by the great Confucians of the past dynasties, there are also a lot of examples ready-made.

Confucian scholars emphasize inheritance, and the Wenhua of the Song Dynasty also inherited the works of sages of the past dynasties, which gave Wang Anshi an inexhaustible source of arguments for his debates.

People are not good at arguing, at least it is not easy to reprimand the sages.

But Sima Guang is different, his arguments are too simple.If you want to open up the word of sincerity, if you have something in your belly, it is Sima Guang's limit to be able to say it for three days.

Shao Yong seems to have just had an idea of ​​an ideological system, or the focus of his real research is not here.

When he mentioned the relationship between hexagrams and lines and the unity of man and nature, he was refuted by everyone in the Daqing Palace.

Zhao Xi wondered if it was because this view was not recognized by the government that Shao Yong let the people pass it on.

Not to mention, when it comes to inheritance, apart from Neo-Confucianism, Shao Yong's Xiang Mathematics has been passed down for a long time, and the audience is no less than Neo-Confucianism... This is Zhao Xi's muttering.

"Officials, the court debate will last for three days."

Han Qi was probably annoyed too.On the first day, when they each stated their views, they felt a little novel about Han Qi, and they wanted to listen to him.

On the second day, when each school had more arguments than theoretical explanations, Han Qi was no longer interested in listening.

On the third day, even Sima Junshi became a little messy.Even if the officials still wanted to listen, he, Han Qi, would have to stop.

It can't be that the result of the court debate is that the two boys from the Cheng family in Luoyang won, right?

It's like saying that the government affairs hall of the country is not as good as the small officials and the countryside.As the prime minister, Han Qi would never allow this kind of thing to happen.

"Then three days."

During lunch, Han Qi summoned the ministers of the Political Affairs Hall to Yanfu Palace, and Zhao Xi knew it was time to end.

That's good, at least Zhengshitang is not a bunch of nerds.

Don't think this is a court debate, even if everyone is eloquent, Zhao Xi doesn't think that they are all pillars.

Some things need to be done because they have a purpose of their own.

……

"The three-day court debate demonstrated the prosperity of our great Song Dynasty, and we can indeed express our feelings by benefiting a lot."

This is a court debate, and the concluding statement is reserved for Zhao Xi.

"In the past three days, I have listened to everyone's arguments, and I have some insights to share with you..."

ah?They were all stunned.The ministers of the political affairs hall were even more stunned.

What are the officials doing?It's all about everyone, the most correct thing for the officials to summarize the court defense is to say a few superficial words, only for the court defense, not about winning or losing or school views.

Because, the imperial court is the most inappropriate to have an attitude at this time.

The entire country knew that the court debate was caused by scientific research, and the official speech at this time represented the direction of scientific research.

Is it possible to interrupt the official speech?No, no one can.

Han Qi was anxious, and Han Jiang and Lu Gongbi were even more anxious.The two of them had a much deeper understanding of officials than Han Qi.

Regardless of whether it was written by Lu Gong or Han Zhen, in the correspondence between the brothers, they often talked about the official family, but they never said that the official family had such performance.

Wang Anshi and Sima Guang were worried that the officials would deny their views...~

"Let's talk about what it is first. In my opinion, Tao is a rule, a rule. It can be the source, or it can be a modification."

"Take cooking cakes and cakes as an example... It may not be as profound as you guys, but it should explain the problem."

"Cooking cakes and cakes are originally made of wheat or flour, with different condiments added, made in different ways, and finally become different foods."

"Flour is the way of origin, just like what Zhang Zihou said about emptiness and qi. If the particles of flour are regarded as qi, then qi is the origin of cooking cakes and cakes. But can the particles of flour be explored in a more subtle way? Perhaps After all, when it reaches infinitesimal, it is the gas defined by Zihou, and it becomes the grain of flour because of gasification.”

Let's talk, Zhao Xi also knows that he is talking, can he stand still, can he come back in the end?Take a look.