Infinite Life: Trapped in a lifetime

"From a theoretical level, the possibility of breaking through the life limit has been rejected."

"The lifespan paradox: The human body's own genes and mechanism framework can only support the ultimate lifespan of one hundred and thirty years."

"Academician Mo Dao used detailed and solid data and rigorous logical inferences to describe in detail a human body system composed of multiple mechanisms in the human body, and elaborated on its relationship with the aging mechanism."

"The aging mechanism is integrated with other mechanisms of the human body and cannot be changed alone: ​​breaking through the lifespan limit is completely lost in theory."

This relatively large academic paper is quite obscure for other scholars in the same field. It will take time to fully understand it, and it will also take time to completely repeat the experiments involved.

For people outside academia, the vast majority of people don't even say they understand it. After downloading a paper of more than 200 pages, they open it and take a look, but they don't have the courage to turn a few more pages.

But that’s okay.

While scholars in some fields spontaneously conducted some deep or shallow interpretations of Mo Dao's paper,

A large number of media naturally followed suit and reported on it.

In addition to some more professional publications,

Most mass media,

When reporting, perhaps the wording is less rigorous and less accurate in the academic field,

But it is indeed quite crude and direct, intuitively explaining the significance of Mo Dao’s academic paper.

Some local media, and even self-media, use even more exaggerated words.

"Academician Mo's latest academic achievement shows that human beings have completely lost the possibility of immortality."

"Since the birth of human beings, the maximum life span has been determined and cannot be changed!"

"..."

And these indeed allowed people to have some understanding of the significance of Mo Dao's paper for the first time.

In a very short time,

It was like a bombardment of information, letting most people on the Internet and in reality know about this matter.

…

If we talk about the results of previous further research on cancer mechanisms,

Being able to create so much excitement outside the academic world so quickly,

To a large extent, it was influenced by Mo Dao's own influence.

The conclusions of this research on aging mechanisms and lifespan limits can already stir up excitement.

Just when the official website of Capital University was still down,

Relevant news immediately landed on the hot search lists of various social platforms.

The number one hot word is,

"Academician Mo Lifespan Limit"

Further down, there are basically similar entries.

"The lifespan limit cannot be broken theoretically!"

"There is no possibility of immortality."

“Capital University official website crashed”

"Is it possible to bypass Academician Mo's aging mechanism and lifespan paradox theory?"

And the reason why it’s so lively,

To a large extent, it is also because this matter actually has something to do with everyone.

When you click on the relevant news or posts under each entry, you can see a large number of constantly new comments and discussions.

"Okay, I've sent it. I was originally engaged in research on aging mechanisms. Now this field has been explored by Academician Mo. I'm already preparing to change the subject."

"...Does this mean that, in theory, we don't have the possibility of living for hundreds or thousands of years... When I was a child, I thought that when I get older and technology advances, everyone can live for hundreds of years... "

"...Congratulations to Academician Mo for another major achievement. I don't know why, and it's not directed at Academician Mo. I'm a little disappointed when I see this conclusion... although there is no technology that can break the lifespan limit."

Regarding Mo Dao’s achievements in the field of research on aging mechanisms and ultimate life span,

Most people's emotions are actually somewhat complicated.

The research was completed, but the possibility of human immortality was disproven.

Perhaps with the advancement of science in the future, there will be another possibility to bypass Dean Mo’s existing theory and find another way to extend human lifespan.

But at this moment, it is most likely difficult to see them.

To a certain extent, this is actually a kind of trust that most people have in Mo Dao.

"Actually, we haven't even reached the maximum lifespan of one hundred and thirty years yet. It would be good to consider letting each of us live to the maximum lifespan first. Let's talk about breaking through the lifespan limit later... Okay, I feel the same. It’s a bit of a pity.”

"One hundred and three, that is the limit of human lifespan, not ours...how old you are when you die of old age is your limit of lifespan..."

"Thank you to Academician Mo for his achievements in the research on aging mechanism and extreme life span. Regardless of whether it is good or bad for human beings, it does not affect the objective existence of this matter itself and is not affected by Academician Mo's research. Academician Mo It just makes us fully aware of this matter... Also, let me ask, is it really impossible for people to exceed the limit of life span? "

"... Let me briefly describe the change in my mood at this moment. I didn't think much about whether it is possible for human beings to break through the life span limit. Then today I saw Academician Mo doing research on breaking through the life span limit, and I couldn't help but have a little hope. expectations, and then saw that the possibility of human immortality was theoretically denied... To be honest, it does feel a bit regretful. "

"Upstairs, how can I say that there is no possibility of immortality? Academician Mo's research only said that the existing technology does not allow it, and at the same time, if the technology allows it, there is no way to maintain the human state and extend life."

"You can wait until the technology matures, and then you can stop being a human being."

"...If I just look like a monster, or still look like a human, and have a human mind, but the inside is different, I can still accept it. If the self-awareness is gone, what's the point..."

At this moment,

There are discussions on the Internet about everything.

There are people with complicated moods,

Some of them were still unwilling to give up, and cautiously asked whether Academician Mo's research was not perfect enough.

There are also worries that after the results of this study, some research projects in related life science fields will be completely suspended, and humans will lose the possibility of continuing research on breaking the limit of life span.

Of course, complex feelings are complex emotions,

Maybe occasionally there are two people who are not clear-headed,

However, among the mainstream public opinion, not many people are angry with the researcher Mo Dao because of this.

Most people's discussion still remains on the topic of 'there is no possibility of immortality'.

"...I didn't fully understand the paper. If other researchers had come up with the results, I might have dismissed them, but I felt a little uncomfortable after reading Academician Mo's research conclusion. Because I know that Academician Mo is most likely right. ”

"There is no possibility of immortality... Actually, if you think about it, death is the most equal thing. If the maximum life span of human beings can really be extended, it may not be a good thing. But I still can't help but think about it. Hundreds of years, thousands of years or something..."

This boiling discussion about the research results of Mo Dao’s aging mechanism and lifespan limit,

In the public sphere, and even in academia, the curtain has not come to an end for a while.

But it lasted for quite a long time.

Within the general public, the focus is mainly on the impact of the practical significance of this achievement.

The academic world mainly focuses on Mo Dao's academic paper itself.

All universities and large research institutions have basically set up specialized teams.

Repeatedly verify the experiments involved in Modao's paper, and demonstrate Modao's entire paper.

In the end, amidst the quarrels and uproar, the academic community finally came to a unified conclusion:

"Academician Mo is right."