I’m Almost Losing to a Muggle

Lin Dong calmed down a little.

Probably because the cookies are so good.

The biscuit he endorsed was really, really good.

It has developed steadily over the years, and has grown from an unknown small brand to a best-selling pot inside and outside.

Lin Dong plans to drop the endorsement of clothes next year.

But he doesn't intend to reject the biscuit, even though this biscuit brand is still unworthy compared to other identities.

The key is to give more.

It's not about money, it's mainly because there are too many biscuits.

eat whatever you want!

This is very arrogant.

And there are often new flavors, so you don't have to worry about getting tired of it.

Well, the real reason is that Tom Hardy is really not suitable for the new 007.

Even if you are not a spy movie fan, I believe you have seen more or less 007 movies with James Bond as the protagonist.

The Daniel Craig that everyone is familiar with is actually just one of many leading actors, and it can also be said to be the most successful one.

It's a pity that, in his forties and close to fifty, he has gradually been unable to do what he wants.

After all, not everyone can be as desperate as Tom Cruise.

Moreover, Daniel Craig paid 25 million US dollars for a single film, which is too high.

Iron Man starring Robert Downey Jr. is currently only 20 million.

Moreover, in movies other than Iron Man, his salary will be reduced to 10 million, and if he encounters a good script, he can also consider it within 1,000.

Daniel Craig's high pay has become the biggest drag on the 007 series.

The upcoming filming step has confirmed that Daniel Craig will play the role of James Bond for the last time. In addition to making the audience look forward to his performance, everyone is also very curious about who will take over.

a thousand reader with a thousand hamurate.

Bond is no exception.

The hotspots of people's discussions are mainly concentrated on a few people, including Henry Cavill who plays Superman, Dou Sen who plays Loki, and Michael Fassbender who plays Magneto...

Bond can have many characteristics, but a few are basically limited.

British accent, about 30 or 40 years old, about 180 tall, with a stylish appearance...

And Tom Hardy has a hairy temperament.

He's Bane in The Dark Knight Rises; he's the vigilante in Mad Max: Fury Road; and he's Eddie Brock in the upcoming Venom.

Tom Hardy is indeed the hottest star in Hollywood.

But he was too rough.

If Tom Hardy were to play Bond, this would probably be an R-rated movie.

Teacher Tang has acted in too many R-rated movies.

It's hard to connect his image with James Bond, the secret agent role.

There is a high probability that James Bond like that will not use his brain to solve problems.

Because his brain is stuffed with chicken.

settlement!

Settle this 007, what is it called.

007: Outlaws.

Tsk tsk, look at this crappy name, who the hell would expect anything from it.

【Settlement in progress...】

[Project name movie 007: Outlaws, with a total income of 688 million US dollars, a total expenditure of 265 million US dollars, and a profit of 423 million US dollars. According to the investment ratio (80%), you will recover the investment cost and get a profit of 165 million US dollars, which is very Pity……】

[Since the consumption is not the initial capital of the system, the settlement fee galleon will not be granted]

[After settlement, since the funds in the system account are not zero, a new round of starting funds will not be issued. The current fund balance of your system account is 5.8 billion Huaxia coins (excluding other funds in the company account)]

Good guy, it's more than a billion.

This frankly earns more than Venom, Mr. Tang, are you trying to slap me in the face?

My boss is very upset with you, whether you can make it up or not.

What's even more outrageous is that you fucking signed five movies.

Despicable!

Boss Lin was about to cry from anger.

So, he called Su Tong and asked MGM to report the matter to the head office.

Accused them of not consulting the parent company on the casting of 007.

Yes, it's just a fucking fault finding.

Was it right or wrong to pick Tom Hardy?

Is not this nonsensical?

The box office is there.

The settlement method outside the pot is different. The composition of the total income includes the box office split, which is about 40% of the total box office.

And some other income.

Copyright protection outside the pot is indeed better than what we have done.

Of the total revenue of 688 million US dollars, at least half of it is the box office.

As for this movie, MGM's total share is 80%, and the rest is likely to be reciprocated and shared with other Hollywood companies.

Do you want to be so harmonious? Are you planning to live together?

If 500 million of the 688 million is a box office share, then the total box office of the movie 007: Outlaws exceeds one billion US dollars.

One billion is a lot, and this is a doula.

The global box office of Iron Man is only 585 million.

So far, there are only five Marvel movies with more than one billion dollars, Avengers, Iron Man 3, Avengers 2, and American Team 3.

Black Panther and Avengers 3 may both surpass it, but at least they are not in theaters yet.

The ancient IP of 007 is actually not very good anymore.

Out of date.

Otherwise, MGM would not sell itself to bury itself.

This is not good, not to say that its box office is not good, 007: Casino Royale has a box office of 640 million US dollars, 007: Quantum of Solace has a box office of 586 million US dollars, 007: Skyfall created a box office of 1.1 billion US dollars, 007: Specter $877 million at the box office.

The problem with it is that one is dystocia.

It's not easy to come out with one.

Another problem is high cost.

Daniel Craig's personal salary is 25 million US dollars, and other shooting costs are getting more and more expensive.

The cost of the last one has reached 250 million US dollars.

If we add other copyright promotions and various expenses, the total expenditure of a 007 will reach more than 400 million.

The precarious MGM couldn't afford to shoot.

Now, if another person plays the role, it can still earn a billion at the box office.

The first one made a billion box office.

Tom Hardy This is not a one-line fix.

Okay Mr. Lin, I will criticize them. Tom Hardy really doesn't fit our Chinese people's impression of 007. It's just that the project over there has been finalized and reported to us to go through the process. Mr. Du's approval is feasible. I posted a post saying that I am looking forward to the wonderful performance of the new 007.

Su Tong didn't understand why the boss was so excited.

But she still tried her best to appease the boss, what a big deal, it's worth the boss, do you know how to get angry?

Could it be that he was worried that Tom Hardy would not perform well and would ruin the box office?

In fact, don't worry, this time Daniel Craig didn't ask for much salary because of his many cooperation with MGM.

Tom Hardy lowered his pay to $4.5 million to win the role.

The movie doesn't really spend much money on actors' remuneration.

Once the cost is reduced, even if the box office is slightly lower, it will not affect our 007 to make money for MGM.