Entertainment Empire System

At this time, just to tease you, after everyone applauded, I suddenly said very seriously: "Ah, I'm sorry everyone, there was a little mistake in the introduction just now. But don't doubt me. As a professional host, it’s not that I made a mistake. The lines were given to me like this. I said them according to the lines. However, when our director was recording the information while collecting information, there was a slight mistake. A small mistake. The staff member we were responsible for inputting made a small mistake.

However, everyone can forgive my colleague because she has just given birth to a baby. We have often heard the saying that one pregnancy will make you stupid for three years. Don't worry about this kind of thing. "

At this time, the audience burst into laughter. If this was the case under normal circumstances, the recording program would have to be re-recorded. It must have been a recording accident. As a director, you can make mistakes in the script of the program. Such a director will be fired directly, and there is no way he can continue to stay on the program team.

However, this is something to say today. People have something to say today. His host and director even said that the director’s ideas are different from others. To others, this is a broadcast accident. However, at this time, in Elite It is said that this program is just a joke and a burden.

This is a baggage deliberately designed by the director. In fact, many old viewers are also very familiar with this style of today's talk.

Today someone said that not only would he make fun of his own director, but he would also often make fun of the director himself.

The director's fancy "The winner is king" was invented by the director.

So, as a director who has something to say today, it’s nothing to do with defying the heavens and the earth, and criticizing black people’s enemies against themselves.

Therefore, in such a situation, as the host, I am teasing you, and in this relaxed atmosphere, I brought out today's topic.

At this time, am I teasing you? Then he said: "No gossip? Let's get back to the topic. Today's topic is not how to educate children. Maybe my colleague is too concerned about how to educate his children, so he entered it. When? There was a little mistake. How do we educate our children? This was an alternative answer when we were discussing? Our real answer today is that the two pairs of guests we have invited are It’s relevant. The real theme we identified today is exam-oriented education and quality education.”

After this topic was exposed by the host, it immediately caused a sensation on the scene. Good guy, quality education and exam-oriented education? Do we still need to compare this?

Is there no need to compare at all? The audience in the audience was dumbfounded. This is actually a very attractive part of today's good books. Even the audience? I don't know what kind of topic you will face today.

In fact, even if you see the guests invited today, you see the experts invited today, but what? You can't judge what kind of topic the sperm will be talking about today, because today there is something to say like this As for a program, it basically relies on topics to increase ratings.

Why is it said today that there is always a group of fans? That's because, under such a situation, if he dares to say something today, he really dares to say some topics, which are not appropriate for Shaanxi TV station and can easily be taken down.

However, because this is a national television station, today's talk has a strong backer, so people dare to choose some relatively sensitive topics and dare to touch on the sidelines.

So, it is justifiable for people to use this **comfort rate. Who calls people to have strong backers? This time, today I will talk about what he actually did on such a topic. It is indeed very challenging. , how to educate children and exam-oriented education and quality education.

These two topics are basically discussing how to educate children. The central ideas of the two subjects are how to educate children well.

However, if you look at it from the perspective of attention, of course the topic of exam-oriented education and quality education is even more impactful.

Although, the society calls for quality education every year, we must pay close attention and we must implement it well, but in fact it is useless, you know?

What really represents a student's level is exam-oriented education, and it still depends on whether the student's academic performance is good or not. Even if you are admitted to film school, it still requires a certain score of exam-oriented education, right?

Of course, this is not the point. The point is a student's acting skills and other things.

But for the vast majority of people, it is impossible to say that everyone can take the film school entrance exam, nor can it be said that everyone can pass the exam. So, there is no doubt that the mainstream of society now is exam-oriented education.

Quality education is a loud slogan every year, but quality education is useless. What does quality education include? Of course that includes sports, right?

If your physical fitness improves, of course it has something to do with physical education. As for the physical education teacher, it seems that the teacher with the worst health in the whole school is sick and busy all day long. Teachers who teach major subjects such as Chinese, Mathematics, English, etc. often occupy physical education classes. time, let alone this point.

Even small classes such as history, biogeography, etc. dare to squeeze in a time like physical education.

So, quality education, of course the slogan must be shouted, but the actual implementation, how each school implements it, it still depends on the teacher himself. Haven't you seen that the most laid-back person in the whole school is the physical education teacher?

The physical education teacher basically gives you one physical education class every month, which is already very gracious.

So, under such a situation, is it necessary to compare quality education and exam-oriented education? There is no need to compare this at all, but there is something to say today that such a topic has actually been raised.

We really invited representatives from the red side and the blue side. Needless to say, the three top students in the country as representatives of the red side are the true representatives of exam-oriented education. The top students are other people’s children in the eyes of the audience.

As for Lan Fang, the two young writers are both child actors who dropped out of high school. At this time, although they did not drop out of school, they went back to film school.

There is no comparison here. To be honest, this child star is still a has-been. The child star must also be a representative of the opposing side. Everyone knows this. This time, the program team should have poached a representative of the blue side. There is a big pit waiting for the blue team’s representative to jump into it.

At this time, the atmosphere of the scene has actually been aroused. The host teased you and immediately struck while the iron was hot and said: "So today, we will first invite Master Alpaca to come, so let's talk about today's topic. Alpaca The master very kindly took the microphone and said, okay, today I will just throw some light on it. In fact, our topic today is very easy to understand.

At this time, we will talk about how to become talents. Whether it is quality education or exam-oriented education, our first point is to let our children become talents and let our children become the pillars of the country. There is no doubt about this, whether it is exam-oriented education. Education or quality education, different paths lead to the same goal. All of this is for children to be able to truly succeed and not lose to others at the starting point of life, or even surpass others.

So let’s get back to it, exam-oriented education and quality-oriented education actually make everyone more familiar with exam-oriented education. For example, our three representatives from the red side today, the three best students in the country, are all top academics. Is this good for other people’s children?

This is clear at a glance. Just by looking at the academic performance, you can tell that the child must be good and must be someone else's child. This is a rule recognized by society and has been established for many years.

Anyway, if your children study well and are top academics, they will receive special preferential treatment in school. Although I don’t agree with this view, if you study well, you will learn a little slowly, and if you study poorly, you will be criticized by the teacher. .

I personally don't particularly agree, but this is also a standard to measure a student's hard work from a certain perspective.

Those who don’t study well despite working hard are in the minority after all, right? If you are a normal person and are willing to work hard, your academic performance will definitely be the same. It is impossible for everyone to be a top student, but if you study hard, your academic performance will definitely be the same.

I once saw a class of 36 students in high school. As a result, all 36 students were admitted to 985211 University.

So, it can be seen from this point that if you are willing to study hard, your grades will definitely not be bad. Although you may not be able to become a top student or the top scorer in the college entrance examination, but, if you take a There is no problem with relatively good undergraduate universities.

So, exam-oriented education has a rigid indicator, which means it is clear at a glance whether you have studied well or not, and whether you have worked hard or not is also clear at a glance.

Of course, if you insist that there are very few, I mean, maybe, for example, maybe it’s a little bit so at least there are some problems, and you won’t be able to learn even if you kill me. I’m not saying that I have a low IQ, I It's just that the child's IQ may be slightly lower than average.

People can't learn it even if they die, so there's no way around it. That's a special exception. What we're talking about now is a comparison between ordinary exam-oriented education and quality-oriented education. I personally think that quality-oriented education is more The virtual kind.

Exam-oriented education is pragmatic. Are we pragmatic or pragmatic?

As for this point, in fact, as an expert, I think that both hands must be grasped hard. Of course, the masses have sharp eyes. Which is better, exam-oriented education or quality-oriented education?

I believe everyone should be well aware of this. Exam-oriented education is a quality education that is generally recognized by everyone. It is not particularly bad, right?

You see, the **** from the South sitting in front of us now are outstanding representatives of quality education. Two young writers and one child star, right?

This is the result of quality education.

It’s not that quality education is definitely not particularly good. However, I have studied so many subjects, and more people agree that education is more important, because exam-oriented education can be successful as long as you are willing to work hard, but when it comes to quality education As for quality education, you may not be able to succeed if you work hard, you need talent.

For example, painting or writing require talent. Only one child with such talent, or even one or two out of 100,000 people, may be able to truly succeed. His chance of success is too low. This is my personal point of view, starting from the data I researched. I use the data to speak. I do not evaluate these two opinions with a personal color. I want to be as fair and impartial as possible. I am just talking about data and do not represent my personal views. It means that I personally agree with exam-oriented education or quality-oriented education. In fact, I agree with both. "

At this time, it can actually be seen that Master Yangtuo is indeed biased.

Although he didn't really say it, it can be heard from Master Yangtuo's words that Master Yangtuo is in the field of exam-oriented education.

Of course, the mainstream of society is indeed exam-oriented education. As long as you study well, you will be a good student in the eyes of parents and teachers. Even if you make a mistake occasionally, it is forgiven.

However, if you do not study well, then you are a bad student. You may not be a bad student, but you are definitely a bad student, and you will definitely not be liked by teachers and parents.

Such a thing is actually very frustrating. The entire social environment is like this. It is no wonder that Master Yangtuo will definitely stand in the aspect of exam-oriented education.

However, as an expert, he cannot say that I will definitely support you, right?

This at least allows him to say that he dares to oppose quality education in front of the camera. It is impossible because he advocates quality education. This kind of slogan is shouted loudly every year, allowing Master Yang Tu to openly oppose quality education in front of the camera. , he still won’t do this.

So, at this time, what Master Yangtou said was very euphemistic, but he also made his own point of view clear and supported exam-oriented education.

Because basically one person is a good person and the other is a bad person. This is also a habit that people have to talk about today.

This time, everyone can hear that the shaking master is singing with a red face, because after all, the territorial master has just started to say that he supports quality education, and of course he supports it more. He must grasp it with both hands and be hard with both hands. A little bit means that he is a popular singer.

In other words, Master Yangtuo is a conciliatory person this time, but what about the remaining expert Zhao Kuo? At this time, there is no doubt that his point of view must be a clear-cut stand on the side of a representative like the red side.

This is a problem that old viewers will be aware of. Since Master Sheephead has a red face, then 90% of the care experts have a white face.