Disaster Artist

The latest website: "'Tourist' won a three-minute standing ovation at the premiere of the Weihai Film Festival! The first wave of word-of-mouth broke the table!"

At the Weihai Film Festival, everything is still about the movie. Those gossips outside the venue have no place in the movie evaluation and discussion. Just when the social network is immersed in the debate of "Tao Ran VS Lu Qian's red carpet who is slightly better" , Wei Hai's discussion hotspot has long revolved around "tourists".

While avoiding spoilers as much as possible, everyone can't wait to give their opinion -

After all, from the moment the Weihai Film Festival announced the list of exhibitors for the main competition unit, people have been wondering what kind of answer sheet Lu Qian will hand over.

Now, the answer is finally revealed.

Some people don't like it.

"Premiering", 60 points, "From a certain point of view, Lu Qian did keenly grasp the essence of psychological horror, and while sounding the alarm, it left a question for the audience. It must be admitted that Lu Qian is still Clever; but the excellence of the previous two works made us look forward to more, and the final product just saw 'little clever'."

"Cinema Circle", 65 points, "Movies are dark at times and absurd at other times, even heartburning, but the classical soundtrack is so loud that it robs the film of its own weight— - This is not a good thing, because when there is no soundtrack, the impact of the image is significantly reduced, showing Lu Qian's lack of confidence."

Medium review, two.

After the premiere of "Tourist", forty-seven professional media commented in an instant, among which, zero was rated as bad, two rated as medium, and all the others were rated as positive.

Even in the middle review, "Premier" and "Film Circle" gave a large degree of affirmation. It's not that the movie is bad, it's just that the movie is not good enough.

It can be seen from this that there is absolutely a reason for "Tourists" to be shortlisted for the main competition unit of the Weihai Film Festival. The decision of the film selection committee of the film festival has been praised by the media. After "unfriend" and "raid", Lu Qian's The third work debuted in Weihai, detonating the first round of comments.

However, the most special part of the Weihai Film Festival is:

In addition to professional film critics, independent media, personal media, and senior film enthusiasts are all involved, and their comments can be seen for the first time. Compared with commercial films, these voices are truly involved in the film industry. Refraction deserves more attention in the field of art film.

such as the distribution market.

Those distribution companies will also watch the film themselves, but at the same time they will also listen to the voices from the scene, and judge the market prospects of the film through the feedback of these senior film practitioners and fans. After all, after the release of art films, the main audience is to pay attention to the film festival. crowd.

Naturally, the social network comments released by "tourists" for the first time will also attract a certain amount of attention, and every viewer who watches the movie at the premiere has the right to speak.

"So-so. It's still a familiar routine. Compared with the first two works, Lu Qian didn't break the frame, which is a bit disappointing; but I still have to admit that Lu Qian's camera movement, composition and soundtrack are very good; in addition, the actor training is very good. Well, there is hope for Zeng Yuanwen to compete for acting awards."

"Lower than expected. It's not because of the routine, but because there is nothing new in the routine, and the director seems to be worried that his point of view is not clear enough, and repeatedly uses plot stacking to emphasize his point of view , which is clumsy and uninteresting."

"Although the mechanical feeling presented by the film is what the director wants the audience to feel, this kind of story that has been repeated 20,000 times and put on a mechanical shell will immediately make people uninterested - and the director did not tell the story. What's new, it's better to appreciate the director's looks." Gu

"Two problems, one is that the soundtrack is overwhelming, and the other is that the ending is superfluous. From this, it can still be seen that the director is timid and lacks confidence in his own narrative and scheduling ability. In fact, the director can be more confident. You can also watch the director when you watch a movie.”

On the whole, it is still a "mixed like and dislike" middle review, and there are not many really pure negative reviews.

From professional film critics to ordinary audiences, everyone can feel the same point of view, whether they like it or not, but the atmosphere and impact created by the film are real, and can be seen more or less in different voices Some kind of appreciation, which further verifies that the feedback information of "visitors" is uniform and similar.

However, ordinary audiences are obviously a bit harsher than professional media. After all, the number of elites and middle classes among ordinary audiences has been significantly reduced, and they have no way to be stinged with empathy, and the shock and impact of the film will naturally be weakened. lead to differences in comments.

Fortunately, these are just a few.

Naturally some people like it too.

"Spotlight", 100%, "a film that is worth savoring and can be interpreted from different angles, starting from the marriage relationship, exploring the role of parents and gender relations; and then further cutting into the elitism of the middle class, and rising to the society In interpersonal relationships, rich and profound discussion content can be so highly self-consistently integrated. Lu Qian wrote a perfect script."

"Entertainment Weekly," 100%, "It's funny and sad, staring and being stared at at the same time. Without a doubt, Lu Qian's talent is once again the most commendable shining moment of the year so far."

"Independent Film", 100%, "The film is full of dark humorous details, sharp and smart enough. How did Lu Qian become so charming and so talented?"

"Lanchuan Daily", 100%, "The movie can be interpreted from any angle you want, regardless of age, gender, class and role, when you express your love or dislike of this movie, it means that you have Entering the world built by Lu Qian - the most powerful thing about the director is that every character in the movie, including the audience in front of the big screen, is an important part of the script."

"Inside the Movie", One Hundred, "Best Screenplay of the Year! I can't wait to go to the cinema and watch it for the second time~www.wuxiaspot.com~The World of Light and Shadow", One Hundred, "I'm trying to express something, But thinking about it seriously, it is obvious that this wise, ingenious, sharp and wonderful film needs more time to settle, so I gave up thinking and just sent applause for the rising Lu Qian."

It's a little unbelievable to say...

Why are they all full marks?

But the fact is that one full score fills the field of vision one after another, and praises around Lu Qian continue to emerge. Although everyone’s speech is restricted due to the avoidance of spoilers, the comments are often simple; however, the praise and Amazed, I can still deeply feel the excitement of this group of professional film critics:

Most of them are middle class, which also means that the "tourist" story hits on their soft underbelly and status quo.

Moreover, He Shaoguang, the legendary film critic of "Film Manual", only said one sentence:

"Master Weather!"