Cardcaptor at Hogwarts

"He has been dead for many years."

Professor Dumbledore said helplessly:

"As for his descendants, his son became a Death Eater and has now been executed."

Although the group of Death Eaters back then were subjectively imprisoned for an unknown number of years, for others they were basically killed the next day.

Only Bellatrix, who refused to repent during the detention process and died unconsciously in endless detention, can be taken back while her family is still alive - in this case, there is no longer any question whether the death penalty will be executed or not. It makes sense.

Hearing what Professor Dumbledore said, Professor Grindelwald let out a complicated sigh.

On the one hand, it was regretful to know that he could not take action personally to vent his anger. On the other hand, Professor Grindelwald knew that even if he wanted to take action against Travers, he would have to pay a price.

Maybe the Ministry of Magic can't find traces, but that boy Adam can definitely find traces. After all, that guy can even pull his past self...

The movie did not stop with the exchange between the two old men. Through Rita's memories, everyone saw her and Newt's student days.

Mrs. Tina looked at this section very seriously.

But even with her understanding of Newt, she never imagined that Newt's Boggart would actually be sitting in an office working...

Is Newt's distaste for boring office work so intense?

Watching Newt turn the boggart into a dragon made from modified desks, Mrs. Tina felt dumbfounded, and the audience burst into laughter.

Newt is probably the only one in the world with such a unique Boggart.

And if Newt's Boggart brought everyone joy, then Rita's Boggart made people confused. Everyone only saw a piece of white cloth floating in the sky... What was that?

"Little wontons?"

Accompanied by an uncertain question, the audience who had tasted this delicacy at the Storm Restaurant couldn't help but twitch their eyes——

Don’t tell me, it looks quite similar!

But this is obviously a joke. Where did the little wontons come from in the British wizarding world at that time, and how could anyone be afraid of the little wontons...

It's a pity that the movie did not reveal what the mysterious Boggart was, and the subsequent conversation between Newt and Leta under the tree quickly diverted the audience's attention.

"Is this the tree that belonged to Snape and Lily in The Boy Who Lived?"

One audience member couldn't help but have a slightly subtle expression.

"No...it shouldn't be, right? They hadn't entered Hogwarts yet at that time, and this tree should be inside Hogwarts."

The audience who said this was a little nervous. Although they knew that the two trees were not the same tree, the sense of déjà vu was too strong.

What does this want to express? Will the childhood sweethearts playing under the tree not be able to be together in the end?

After these movies are released, it is foreseeable that young couples in the future will probably avoid this environment under the tree. For no other reason than this environment is a bit unlucky...

On the other end, Queenie was comforted by a kind person after leaving the French Ministry of Magic. Queenie followed the person back as a guest. Who knew that the person was actually a follower of Grindelwald, and she also met Grindelwald directly.

Just when the audience couldn't help but feel worried about Queenie, Grindelwald did not take action against Queenie, but opened his mouth to recruit Queenie, and let her go after Queenie silently refused.

Seeing Queenie, who was nodding but shaken on her face, the audience's hearts suddenly died.

Although Queenie rejected Grindelwald, Grindelwald's solicitation just hit the point. Queenie was heartbroken and collapsed because of her love for Jacob. What Grindelwald said about wizards and Muggles can A world of free love...

It may not have been alluring to the British wizard, but it was alluring to Queenie.

And now this trick of playing hard to get feels even more familiar, as if I just saw Professor Dumbledore use this trick on Newt just now.

Audiences who have experienced Grindelwald's ability to confuse people in previous plots cannot help but have little hope that Queenie will be persuaded by Grindelwald in the future.

"Is that...the Mirror of Erised?"

Looking at the screen, several viewers who didn't care so much about Queenie couldn't help but say.

"Um?"

Hearing this, the audience who were lamenting about Queenie's visible future of depravity suddenly became energetic. When they looked up, they saw on the screen that it was indeed the Mirror of Erised that appeared in "The Boy Who Lived".

And standing in front of the magic mirror was Professor Dumbledore!

"Oh? Is it going to finally reveal what Dumbledore saw in the Mirror of Erised?"

An audience member smacked his thigh excitedly. When the Mirror of Erised, a treasure, first appeared in the movie, it caused a lot of discussion.

"What will you see in the Mirror of Erised?", "What will XXX see in the Mirror of Erised?", "In-depth discussion of what Harry and Ron saw in the Mirror of Erised", etc. wait……

Compared with these topics, the discussion triggered by Professor Dumbledore's description of what he saw in the Mirror of Erised is one of the most popular.

Well, after all, Harry was not the one who saved the wizarding world in reality, and... "I saw myself holding a pair of thick wool socks" or something like that, Professor Dumbledore's words meant to coax a child. It's a little too obvious.

"Let me see what the pair of 'wool socks' you saw in the Mirror of Erised are..."

A wizard who often contributes to "The Quibbler" had his eyes lit up and stared at the Mirror of Erised on the screen.

In a corner of the screening room, an excited old man almost stood up to see it, but fortunately the old man next to him pulled hard enough.

Under the gaze of the crowd, who were either expectant, excited, or scrutinizing, the Mirror of Erised in front of Professor Dumbledore slowly changed---

Two young wizards stood opposite each other and stretched out their palms toward each other...

"Ha!"

A short shout suddenly sounded in the screening room. The audience finally chose the former between continuing to watch the wonderful secret in front of them and turning around to scold the guy with no public morality.

"Huh?"

A young witch suddenly made a puzzled voice:

"Strange, why is Professor Dumbledore's Mirror of Erised Professor Campbell and..."

She just graduated last year, and she was very impressed by the young professors who openly fell in love on campus.

"Oh, those are Professor Dumbledore and Grindelwald in their youth in the movie. The images of the two professors were used in The Boy Who Lived. Maybe it's because they couldn't find the images of Professor Dumbledore and Grindelwald in their youth."

Her companion explained it to her.

The witch nodded in understanding. In this way... it's really suitable.

After all, they are all young same-sex couples, and it wouldn't be too awkward to be used as the image of another same-sex couple.

If the image of other wizards is used, the wizard whose image is used may not be able to accept being put together with another same-sex wizard, even if their images are used as the young state of two legendary wizards...