Shenhao UP Lord

Chapter 289
Zhou Qimo's distinction, known as the ceiling of talk shows, we still call this form a stand-up comedy instead of a talk show.

Faced with the offensiveness of stand-up comedy, many people's first reaction is that this is determined by the form of stand-up comedy itself. Since it is a comedy, don't substitute yourself, enjoy the humor, and don't take the jokes seriously.

When Guo Degang made up jokes against his partner Yu Qian more and more viciously, he also used the fact that everything on stage was fake as a defense.

Do we have a field of exception for comedy?

Sarcasm and offense are exempted here, or further we can claim that a lot of stress and tension is relieved here, so we can face life healthier.

Is the distinction between on-screen and off-screen so obvious?
Surely we've all heard of stand-up comedy before and isn't it just a joke?
How can you be so incapable of taking jokes?
In many cases, this does not need to be aimed at specific people. For example, the man at the wine table is talking about nasty jokes in general, and it is not aimed at any specific women present. If there are women who express discomfort.

I'm afraid some people will say: Isn't this what is said on the wine table?Why are you so serious? "

Obviously we would never consider "drinking table" or "joking" to be immune to offense, and many times the golden line of that immunity is not so obvious.

We might also say that stand-up comedy is performance after all, and it is this layer of performance that distinguishes the offense from the banter of life or drinking.

In the film and television industry, when an actor offends and harasses another actor while performing on the set, can we say that because it is a performance, it can be exempted?

It's clear that acting is far less special in our hearts.

Perhaps the final defense is that all forms are incapable of immunity from offense, but the sheer entertainment of "stand-up comedy" is so special that we can make an exception for this art alone, and thus cut off from all reality.

Many people take this position aggressively and consider stand-up comedy to be offensive.

Guo Degang's early work "I want to fight against the three vulgarities" also provided such a way of defense, that is, cross talk should discard educational value and provide pure entertainment and laughter. He said: They are all adults, and few people will become bad after listening to a cross talk of.

But Mr. Guo underestimated himself. He said a joke on many occasions: Some people who advise you to be generous without understanding any situation should stay away from him. When lightning strikes him, it will hurt you.

The point of view expressed by cross talk actors that every grievance must be retaliated has become a golden sentence that many people on the Internet often quote when expressing that they will never forgive.

The program called Guo Degang's Reasoning on Station B has already produced 262 jokes?
It can be seen that even for him, cross talk can't just be a joke.

Perhaps there is no occasion where we can justify his offense with "This is comedy, don't take it seriously".

Every Versailles joke satirizes the absurdity of the showman with hyperbole.The recent "it's me the clown" meme is a technical inversion of stand-up comedy.Ma Baoguo's empty ear stem is a homonym.

"u1s1", the abbreviation of "One Says One", seems to say something objective, but it is usually followed by very sarcastic words, which is a departure from expectations.

Of course, irony and sarcasm are the basic forms of Internet hot words that we form online, such as understand brother.The WeChat emoticons we usually use, especially the intercepted GIF emoticons, also use irony as their basic logic.

It can be said that a large part of today's Internet discourse that cannot be ignored is a huge stand-up comedy.

Whether it’s bullet screen comments on station B, Weibo comments, various game forums, Douban groups, or short video comment areas, satire has become the basic form of Internet discourse, and along with various memes, it is exported to the entire network, copied, and spread .

Start talking about hellish words that are offensive, ironic, uncomfortable and confusing.Then we started calling these people Yin Yang masters.

And those who take pleasure in this kind of conflict, offense and discomfort, and are happy to see this kind of attack, also call themselves happy people.

But there is no doubt that people's proficiency in this kind of satire, especially programs like "Tucao Conference" that sells bitterness and sarcasm, are exaggerating this kind of culture, and continue to provide people with models that can be emulated. Exercises and examples.

Don't you think we are embracing satirical culture in an almost crazy way and attitude?
Today's Internet environment holds a terrible atmosphere, where there are not many facts, the reasons are not complicated, and people have little expectation and patience for persuasion and communication.

But in how to say infuriating and disgusting words, it is master-level proficiency.It is here that we discover that insults are not the most depressing, but that sarcasm is often the most infuriating.

This is both a carnival and a Shura field.

Maybe think you are different, you appreciate the sarcasm of stand-up comedy but never use those words in your life, you believe that people can tell the situation, appreciate the sarcasm of stand-up comedy does not affect the way a person speaks.

There will always be people with extremely strong willpower in the world.Because of this, we always use a sentence pattern, that is, "XX is neutral, depending on how we use it." So here, we can also say that sarcasm is neutral, depending on how we use it.

But unfortunately, in every field that we think is neutral and a tool, we seem to be unable to resist the urge to abuse and misuse
Weapons are neutral, technology is neutral, cell phones are neutral, AI is neutral, money is neutral...

If we always screw up with neutral things, maybe we should think twice about neutral irony too.

If this is an era of food scarcity, and I am good at making very delicious fried chicken, in this environment where appetites cannot be satisfied, fried chicken will certainly be of great value and comfort to everyone.

But if this is the age when everyone is obese, do I still have to make delicious fried chicken?

It seems that there is a huge difference from the previous situation?
So is our age today one of lack of fun, entertainment, and irony?
(End of this chapter)