March Simulation: I Pushed One Piece World Sideways

Chapter 202 Unknown
Seal - the appearance of the god of death (only the caster can see it at this time)
The god of death obeys the sealing time arranged by the caster
One caster can seal multiple souls (three successive generations of sealing the first generation, second generation souls, and the ability on both hands on the soul of the serpent)
During the sealing process, the sealed person cannot use ninjutsu (at this time, the sealed person can also see the god of death), and the soul of the performer will also be eaten after sealing
It can be seen that what is sealed is the soul or a part of the soul, but the part of the body that loses this part of the soul loses its autonomy.

And the body that loses the whole soul dies

Regarding the extermination of the genocide, I personally put forward my own objection based on the remarks of 398 spots.

AB is indeed a person who likes to surprise people, the previous remarks about extermination and U can only be overthrown and start over.

What is it that made Konoha's top management panic so much that they wanted to issue such an order to exterminate the genocide?

The simplest reason is that Madara secretly planned to cooperate with the Uchiha clan, and Konoha issued such an order in order to protect himself.

However, as Madara said, it is related to the ninja world.So, what kind of motives will the Uchiha clan have?This is really puzzling.

For the same problem, the benevolent can see benevolence, and the wise can also see wisdom; the same thing can be viewed horizontally as a mountain and as a side as a peak.

It is the same fact that someone sees the positive and someone sees the negative.

Every coin has two sides.

But there is one thing, no matter who writes the analysis, it must be divided into points, and the analysis is well-founded.

If the main premise of the analysis is wrong, will the subsequent analysis be fair and objective?

Can such an analysis be convincing?

Everyone can write, but not everyone can write well.

It is not a bad thing to contend among a hundred schools of thought and to let a hundred flowers bloom, but it is not worth advocating to have mixed fish and eyes

The content of the current analysis post is more about one story and one analysis, more about the direction of the plot, what happened in the past, and what will happen in the future.

I just want to talk about the analysis post about the plot here.

I personally think that it is not objective enough to express an opinion at the beginning of a matter.

There are clues, but Uncle AB likes twists and turns.

I like to come to the [-]th bend of the mountain road, which makes people unpredictable. If there is not enough information, the analysis will inevitably be biased.

There is an idiom in ancient times called "the final conclusion after the conclusion of the coffin", which means that a conclusion is made after a certain process has come to an end.

Of course, if you like to guess the plot, it's okay to like to make guesses before the new episode comes out.

If there is a post like this with accurate predictions we call it great and powerful!

However, if the information is insufficient, will the accuracy of the analysis be greatly reduced?
One discount is a discount for customers, two discounts and more times will the store manager close the store?
Personally, I think this should be the golden point, meaning and soul of the analysis post.

Analysis, there will definitely be personal subjective opinions, but subjective opinions must have objective basis, and objective basis supports subjective arguments.

Including objective arguments, reasonable arguments, and the process of argumentation.

The process of analysis is the process of debate.

During the debate, both sides insisted on their own opinions, either the east wind overwhelmed the west wind, or the west wind overwhelmed the east wind.

There is only one fact, but the argument before the fact is not known depends on whose process is more rigorous and persuasive.

Mistakes or even mistakes are unavoidable in the analysis. Small mistakes do not affect the overall situation, while large loopholes directly affect the objectivity and accuracy of the analysis.

Arguments that are not supported by established facts are inevitably weak.

This is a society where the jungle preys on the jungle. Thin things are too fragile and may look beautiful.

It is very pitiful and sympathetic, but it does not have the power to lead the trend
I personally think that the so-called analysis post is based on convincing people. Whether an analysis can become a high-quality product mainly depends on whether its "reason" is convincing enough.

Popularity, is a reference point.After all, analysis and writing must be read by certain people. However, it should not be the most important criterion.

The amount of water should also be properly controlled.

Since the analysis post is mainly for analysis, I personally think that it should be based on exchanging opinions.

If you are chatting with friends, you can open a water post or Baidu message or Q chat.

We are not AB, so it is impossible to fully understand what kind of medicine is going to be sold in the gourd under AB.

Insufficient analysis accuracy does not greatly affect whether a post becomes a boutique.

I personally think that the argument is rigorous enough, and some small loopholes can completely cover up the flaws, but will excessive deviations ruin the pot of soup?
In fact, there are some things I have wanted to say for a long time. Recently, the debate on this issue in the bar has been a little heated, so I posted this post when my mind got hot.

The purpose is to discuss with you some questions about the analysis posts.The title of "[Fei Analysis]" is used, which is a bit fooling everyone, please forgive me.

It wasn't because of the serialization of comics, the interesting speeches of some people, or the pictures, articles and other reasons that attracted me to it.

What attracted me was a few high-quality analysis posts, to give a few examples: such as "Death Rhapsody", such as DB's "Analysis of CKL".

For example, the analysis of Okuma Maru's predecessors, such as "Analysis of Pupil Art", etc., are very targeted, and the assumptions and inferences also have a strong basis for conclusions.

Personally, I also like to read analysis, and I also like to write analysis by myself.

I dare not say that I have a photographic memory or something, but as a person who has read the complete manga and animation (so far).

I think I still have a certain understanding of the things in the comics, and I often raise questions that I think are suspicious in other people's analysis posts, and discuss them with them.

I hope everyone can express their opinions, but please don't make childish and pure personal attacks.

Even if your point of view is worth thinking about at first, it will give people a greatly reduced impression.

As for the source of this technique?Itachi has already explained.When turning on the kaleidoscope, except Amaterasu and Tsukiyomi.

There is also Suzuo.The ability of the kaleidoscope varies from person to person, and it may be special here, which means that itachi kaleidoscope has this ability.

2: When is the start of this technique?It should be when Sasuke releases Kirin.Because it can be seen later that Xu Zuo's man is gradually formed.

3: What is the method for Suzuo to defend Kirin? 1: Itachi escaped under the outer protection of Suzanoo.

It should be Suzuo's skeleton protecting Itachi, but the absence of Itachi's coat also shows that Itachi was also injured to a certain extent.

As for the shield that appeared in the hand later, it did not appear when the unicorn was released, so it was excluded.

2: Suzuno has the ability to absorb substances, and later has the ability to seal substances against Xuzuo, but the seal requires a gourd.So I agree with the first statement

4: Principle of action?I think Suzano is similar to psychic, but this psychic is not an instant, but a process of formation, starting from the skeleton and continuing to the shape.

And the psychic is similar to a legendary figure.

There is still a question about this psychic-like control issue, whether there is independent thinking, or is it simply controlled by Itachi.

And does the attack require Itachi to gesture.

Two: shape
The whole shape is still based on the theme of family flames, but the color is unknown.Dressed in a cassock-like attire.

The right hand has two small hands, a gourd in one hand and a sword in the other. The sword is released from the gourd.Functions are also divided.

The sword can be used as an attack, and the gourd uses the sword as a guide to seal.There is a shield in the left hand, which should be used for defense.

Judging from the simple battle with Yachi, the ten-fist sword is used quite fast.

(End of this chapter)