blackstone code

Chapter 951 Peace of Mind
At least you won't lose!
This has already satisfied Lynch's requirements for the current situation.

A large number of newspapers reported this news, and the "Bu Pain Times", which had been bad-mouthing the moment, stood up again a few days ago, saying that this is the beginning of a new legend that the moment is moving towards.

Their editor-in-chief even highly praised Lynch's skills in the report, saying that under his intervention, the current downward trend was stopped every moment in time, and he was favored by many evaluation agencies and was expected to create new miracles.

There are also some Moment stores in Bupain, and they have also been "stolen" from the counters of Moment.

Just as everyone expected, the first trial began.

A total of 24 stores in Bu Pain unilaterally tore up the agreement with Every Time, and removed the special counters of Every Time before the contract was fulfilled. The court accepted the case and proceeded to hear it.

With the help of Shi Haoluck and Colorful, 24 shop owners hired a barrister who was willing to represent them in this lawsuit "for free".

According to Bu Paine's market situation, if you want this barrister to file a lawsuit for yourself, you will need to spend at least 10,000+ to hundreds of thousands, or even more.

He told the media that the reason why he did this is that he does not want capitalists to use their wealth and power to use legal weapons indiscriminately, making the law a sharp knife in the hands of capitalists to "slaughter" the people.

His speech aroused a lot of heated discussions in the society. Many people believed that he was the real lawyer with a conscience in the Federation and the moral model of the legal profession.

It's just that they don't know that before he declared "free", he received 30 lawyer's fees from well-meaning people.

Shi Haoyun and Colorful are temporarily unwilling to go off in person and fight hand-to-hand every moment. They need a lawsuit to determine what will happen to them after they go off.

On such a pleasant weekend, the Bupain City Court opened.

After the plaintiff's lawyer expressed his claim, the judge looked at the attorney in the dock, "Does the defendant's lawyer have anything to say?"

When he was questioning, he looked down at some explanatory documents in front of him. In fact, there is no need for a formal trial of this case, and the verdict can be pronounced directly in the express court.

From the judge's point of view, the breach of contract by these defendants is very obvious. No matter what their reasons are, they have created a fait accompli of breach of contract.

Moreover, the only claim in this case is a lawsuit for recovering liquidated damages for breach of contract. It is simple and clear. If it is placed in an express court, it can be pronounced in at most 2 minutes.

It's just that the society and the media are paying attention to this matter now, and a group of the bottom of society are suing all the time. Some authority organizations are paying close attention to this matter, and have no choice but to put it in court for trial.

Just look at the rows of cameras in the back and you can see how much attention has been paid to this case.

The defendant's lawyer stood up, "Your Honor, I have two statements to make."

The judge nodded, he couldn't help but give this guy a chance to speak.

All barristers, except that they do surpass others in terms of professional ability, are more about their social network.

Once the most famous barrister in the Federation, the winning rate of cases represented by him is one of the best in the entire federal judicial history.

His own excellence is only one aspect, and the more reason is his father——

All the way from a judge of a local court to a judge of the Supreme Court of the United States, this is the main reason why he can always guarantee his winning rate.

Later, his father failed in the election for lifelong justice, and the barrister gradually faded out of people's sight, leaving only some myths to the industry.

For example, the defendant's lawyer also has some connections in the judiciary, and it just so happens that the judge knows this.

"The first point is that this case is not a completely isolated case. Before this case happened, the defendants I represented had actually sued the court for breach of contract every moment..."

As he spoke, his assistant brought some materials to the judge's table.

Judges and prosecutors and others each have a copy.

As they flipped through the pages, the defendant's lawyer continued, "It can be seen from the initiation of these lawsuits that the plaintiff has actually unilaterally breached the contract, and my agent is solving the problem through legal means."

"This matter has a sequence, so..."

The lawyer at every moment raised his hand casually, "I object to the statement of the defendant's lawyer, Your Honor, the claims in this case are very clear, and there are no problems as mentioned by the defendant's lawyer."

"We have not breached any form of contract. We have sufficient supply at all times and can deliver goods anytime, anywhere."

"It is a unilateral lawsuit that has not gone through a trial and has no specific trial results. I think it has no reference value and significance in this case."

The judge was silent for a while, then nodded, "The objection is valid, the defendant's lawyer, the lawsuits you mentioned have not yet had judicial results."

"Before it is confirmed that the plaintiff has already breached the contract first, it has an inevitable relationship with this case. Your statement is meaningless."

The idea of ​​the defendant's lawyer is very clear, let the plaintiff first, that is, the first person to breach the contract at every moment, as long as the judiciary recognizes this, then every moment's lawsuit against all the shop owners is meaningless.

why?
Because after every moment of breach of contract, the shopkeepers have unilaterally terminated the contract-this is a decision made under the prerequisite of every moment of breach of contract, and it will also be recognized and protected by the judiciary.

In this way, there is no threat to the shopkeepers, no matter what the counterclaims are at every moment.

It's a pity that today's judge is not so slippery, or he is not on the defendant's side.

Many things are not breached when you say you breached the contract. The Federation is a country ruled by law. The law has not yet said that it breaches the contract every moment. You should first say that he breached the contract. Who should you listen to?

There is no doubt that we must listen to the final explanation of the judicial department.

The defendant's lawyer squinted at his opponent on the other side, and said, "There is another question, Your Honor, I don't think it is an accident that the counters are lost every moment."

"According to the information I have collected, more than 2000 stores across the country have sued them for breach of contract every moment. I have reason to believe that this is actually a case of attempting to obstruct justice."

"Every moment has used some despicable means to steal that kind of special counter, and use this as a means of attack to sue ordinary people who intend to use the law to protect their rights and interests. This case has been disposed of after another case is closed."

The "other case" mentioned by the defendant's lawyer is that more than 2000 stores reported to the police the theft of their counters at the same time. The defendant's lawyer means that the nature of the case can only be determined after the thief is found.

Every hour's attorney raised his hand again, "I object to the statement of the defendant's attorney, Your Honor."

"If the defendant's lawyer doesn't have solid and valid evidence to support his point of view, then I will sue him for defamation."

The judge frowned, and this time he did not immediately support the plaintiff's lawyer's complaint.

Because he knew that what the defendant's lawyer said was not necessarily wrong.

All of a sudden, there were more than 2000 "fraud cases" all over the country. What's even more outrageous is that the other party didn't want anything, but dragged away the special counter of every moment. Absolutely impossible.

Even the judge thought of every moment, or Lynch arranged according to the plaintiff mentioned in the summons, otherwise there would be such a coincidence.

Most of the plaintiffs who sued Lynch were cheated out of the counters every moment?

But the Commonwealth is a country ruled by law, and everyone can have any opinion. Some people even come out now and say that the president is actually an alien, and his purpose is to control the world. There is no problem.

Expressing one's own ideas on any occasion is the most basic right granted to every federal person by the Charter, but if you want your claims and opinions to be supported by the judiciary, you must produce evidence.

Some people will think this is stupid. Everyone knows that this must have something to do with every moment, and they ask for any evidence. This must be a cover-up.

But having said that, if there is no need for evidence because of "everyone thinks", and the number of "everyone" in capitalists is definitely much larger than that of ordinary people, then will capitalists be what they say in the future?

So sometimes it seems to be a rule to make things difficult for ordinary people, but in fact it is to better protect ordinary people.

It doesn't matter whether what the defendant's lawyer said is true or not, what matters is the evidence.

The judge looked at the defendant's lawyer, "How do you prove what you said."

The defendant's lawyer shook his head, "I can't prove it, so I hope to temporarily postpone the sentencing of this lawsuit, and add another trial after the fraud case is over to try the case again."

The judge is very hesitant. Once he makes a decision, other courts and other judges may use his decision as a reference. This is also the consensus of the judicial circle.

It seems that there is nothing to put away, but in turn, they have become the party that loses every moment.

The judge looked up at the plaintiff's lawyer. This was a very subtle and meaningful gesture. He was telling the plaintiff's lawyer that you can object and I will support you.

This kind of statement is like some kind of unspoken rules. People outside the profession don't understand these rules and these small actions, but the plaintiff's lawyer should understand them.

But it was a little surprising that the plaintiff's lawyer did not raise any objections, as if...he seemed to support such a decision.

"Take a break for 10 minutes, we will discuss whether to support the defendant's claim..."

The judge tapped the gavel and left by a side door with a group of people who had to figure out what the hell was going on at every moment.

(End of this chapter)